I REALLY should be in the best of moods. I have two women, friends from way past, with shows on at the Fringe, both exploring and transposing their Asian heritage, two and three generations, bang up to date. But then, while abroad visiting family, I spied friend and colleague Aamer Anwar on TV. Definitely not what I was expecting, and so ended my feelgood factor.
What does it say about our society that it took a specially commissioned report into Scottish Cricket – Changing the Boundaries – for this specific case of institutionalised racism, experienced and witnessed, to be acknowledged and potentially acted on?
READ MORE: Scotland is not an exception in the fight against racist abuse
Two very brave men, Qasim Sheikh and Majid Haq, were victimised and deprived of their places within the sporting arena they loved, trained for and excelled in. This was not two men who were peeved and threatening to take their bats and balls home because they weren’t selected.
The report found evidence that Cricket Scotland displayed 29 out of the 31 indicators of institutional racism with referrals, including 31 allegations of racism against 15 people, two clubs and one regional association. What happened to “see it, report it, call it out”? Well, Qasim Sheikh experienced it and called it out: no action, no support, he went to the press and from then on, he was the “bad guy of Scottish cricket”.
Believing his superiors and expecting to be reinstated, he apologised through a journalist selected by them, only to see the earlier humiliation – just part of the tactics common in racism – getting worse with headlines like “Sheikh eats humble pie”. No reinstatement followed, and the reality was him never playing for his country again.
READ MORE: Scotland’s first Roma culture festival set to take place at Glasgow's CCA
The National quoted fellow player Majid Haq extensively and we must all wonder at the empty gesturing, virtue signalling, social media trolling from those who should have listened, acted and supported these two (Haq points out ‘deafening silence’ from Scots players, July 27).
As this comes to light, their names, experiences, traumas have been bandied about as before, in the press and TV. Funny though, I’ve not seen any pictures nor the names of the board members of Cricket Scotland in place as this all took place.
As alarm bells rang in England, when the truth was uncovered and action started to redress the situation there, was the board here so complacent, so hidebound that they felt they could say “move on, nothing to see here”. Oh wait, they’ve all resigned. What happened to transparency and accountability?
It’s not too much of an imagined leap for me to move from here to there and the Commonwealth Games. How paradoxical that the opening ceremony referred to Britain’s links with the slave trade after the organisers voted not to ignore the Commonwealth’s “problematic history”.
READ MORE: Cricket Scotland report reminds us the true pain of racism is in small acts, words and gestures
The problem is more that countries such as Barbados chose democratically to become a republic. That the royal tours by the Cambridges and Wessexes were disastrous. And that Westminster, currently mired in a succession battle, continues as a democracy-denier. You may change from empire to Commonwealth but the yearning for the past by many is echoed through the ideology.
So was the Changing the Boundaries report a surprise? Sadly no. The gut pain returned along with the questions: after all those years, all that work, just how much has changed? Injustices are not someone else’s problem. Wrongs are neither challenged nor righted through a legal process unless there is first a determination to bring about change. Where are the allies, where is the determination to bring about change?
Selma Rahman
Edinburgh
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel