THE contrast between the two papers could not have been starker. Saturday’s Daily Express led with “PM, please promise to change ‘cruel’ law”, quoting the terminally ill broadcaster Esther Rantzen, who is seeking to “gently” remind the Prime Minister that he promised to make parliamentary time to debate the issue.
The very next day, the Mail on Sunday struck rather a different tone. “Assisted dying bill set to be ‘rushed into law’”, it proclaimed, reporting that “a deeply divisive vote to legalise assisted dying could be held within weeks after Sir Keir Starmer backed plans to fast-track it through the Commons.”
Two right-wing newspapers, two strikingly different slants. Online, the Mail did not hold back, embedding high up in its report an image of a futuristic “assisted dying machine” as if to suggest the old and vulnerable might soon simply be loaded into such contraptions and blasted into space (when in fact its own reporting reveals this particular device has yet to be used).
READ MORE: Glasgow to host Commonwealth Games in 2026, reports say
One could be forgiven for thinking that Keir Starmer’s government was set to table an assisted dying bill, and perhaps even planning to whip Labour MPs into supporting it to “fast-track” its progress.
In fact, the PM has reportedly merely offered two extra staff members to any Labour MP wishing to take the opportunity to table a private member’s bill on the issue, which would lead to a free vote by MPs.
This is significant because several Labour MPs are among the first in line to table such bills – which was to be expected given the size of the party’s majority. Those near the top of the list have yet to say what topics their bills would address while Jake Richards MP, who has indicated he would push for assisted dying, is languishing in 11th place.
It might seem unsatisfactory that luck of the draw dictates whether and when such an important issue is discussed, but that is how the system works. In Scotland, assisted dying is already on the agenda at Holyrood thanks to a member’s bill from LibDem Liam McArthur and here, too, politicians will be free to vote with their consciences.
Campaigners for assisted dying north of the Border will now be watching developments in England and Wales with great interest, and perhaps some trepidation.
The Daily Express launched its assisted dying campaign, Give Us Our Last Rights, in February 2022. It seeks the legalisation of assisted dying in very specific circumstances, but the Daily Mail insists that even “a law to allow terminally-ill adults with a life expectancy of less than six months to end their lives with medical help would spark an intense moral debate over the sanctity of human life and the risks of the legislation being abused”.
READ MORE: Yes would win new independence vote if Scotland were to join EU, poll finds
Indeed it would, but this acknowledges that there would indeed be a debate, contrary to what its alarmist headline might suggest. The newspaper may object to MPs having the opportunity to vote on assisted dying, but “fast-tracking” suggests a chaotic and rushed process, when in fact the route proposed is the only realistic way the issue will be discussed at all.
Esther Rantzen will be delighted to see progress on this issue – she says Starmer told her he hoped she would be alive to see the debate take place – but she must surely wish it was not coming amid the ongoing furore about Winter Fuel Payments being stripped from millions of pensioners.
There can be no perfect timing for a debate on this emotive issue, but those seeking to maintain the status quo may well seek to exploit the anger and sense of betrayal felt by many as temperatures begin to drop.
Labour may now be cynically disavowing their own previous warnings that restricting the payments to pensioners on benefits would cost 4000 lives, but the optics of pushing assisted dying up the political agenda right now, when they are being accused of letting pensioners freeze to death, are far from ideal.
The Daily Mail’s scaremongering might help shift some extra copies to elderly people who fear they may be coerced into ending their lives, but it is giving the false impression that legislation will be drafted in haste – something that its readers (and the rest of us) have every right to fear.
One only need look at countries like Canada, with its dystopian Medical Assistance in Dying programme, to see what can go wrong.
READ MORE: Jonathon Shafi: To put indy back on the table, we have to talk about power
This is why the third attempt at changing the law in Scotland has been very carefully drafted. The title of McArthur’s bill – the Assisted Dying for Terminally Ill Adults (Scotland) Bill – spells out its very specific and narrow parameters, to guard against future amendments that may represent the “slippery slope” some people justifiably fear.
Polling has found 78% of the Scottish public are in favour of “making it legal for someone to seek assisted dying”, and in England and Wales support is similarly strong at 75%.
Were you to ask those same people if they favoured “fast-tracking” legislation on this issue, you might receive different answers, so it is to be hoped calm, reasoned debate will drown out misleading claims, and alarmist headlines do not sway MPs.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel