JIM Taylor’s “branch offices” long letter (Jul 16) covers so many points that have been raised by supporters of Scottish independence, over a very long time, but will sadly be seen, read and understood by far too few.
However, Jim, like so many of us, draws conclusions from what he knows and understands. But how much of that is implanted by the relentless Westminster propaganda machine?
Jim states that Westminster “denies” us the right to exit the Union. Westminster wants us to believe that to be true, but it isn’t. It’s the result of the Unionist propaganda machine, relentless in its endeavour to keep a firm grip on the assets flowing from the north.
READ MORE: Keir Starmer told Grangemouth response is 'critical test' for Labour
It is convoluted, but our politicians – so they tell us – strive for the right to hold a referendum in Scotland on whether or not this rich country should stand on its own two feet, and benefit from its own wealth.
Drill down and you’ll find that a win for that referendum gives our politicians the right to ask their politicians if we can have our ball back please, sir. For reasons unknown to me, our politicians don’t seem to understand that every single time we have elected them to a majority, we have told them to get on with that job.
They were told in no uncertain terms, in that amazing 2015 election. 65 Ayes sent to that place, and just three Naws. Could it be clearer?
That was the referendum we needed, but but but. When I saw those 65 Ayes line up and swear fealty to Westminster and the Crown, I knew the SNP had been bought. When I saw the strength and the vitriol the SNP poured on any who criticised their policies or lack thereof, I saw them digging in.
READ MORE: There's a lesson to be found for the SNP in King's Speech
What has just passed us by was a chance for our MPs to take a stand. To improve the state we’re in, they have to refuse to take that oath to protect the Union, and to do their own thing with regards to the monarchy.
They would still be our MPs, still bear witness to the Scots desire to stand on our own feet. But the Scottish National Party chose to protect the Union. Is that what you wanted? Expected?
“But it’s not all bad,” we’re told by the party machine headed up by their publicity guy that published “The Vow”. Remember that? “Holyrood elections are coming, we must regroup,” they tell us, as though that had an impact on our claim to independence.
Holyrood is a Westminster construct. It is not allowed, by law, to do the things that have to be done to achieve our freedom.
MSPs are not in any way representative of the body that signed us into this penury, whereas our MPs are.
However, our MPs may not secede from the treaties, may not even discuss the case for such an action because they just swore not to, and the penalties are severe.
So the two elected bodies we have trusted to deliver us from evil won’t. It’s “won’t”, not “can’t”.
READ MORE: A summer of silence and heid scratching won't cut it for the SNP
Two possibilities lie in the near future. They both revolve around the 2026 election. Either the SNP see the value in having a Scotland-wide Yes majority, by opening up the second vote to Yessers, or stick to their guns and put party before country yet again. But don’t be concerned, as neither result leads to the solution – that will still lie with our MPs. Holyrood can only ask permission, no matter its majority.
If they choose the first option, they may well achieve a majority that allows increased powers to be allocated to them, including the right to hold referenda. Any resulting referendum can only result in Holyrood asking permission.
People outside the recognised political framework toil relentlessly to put in place a respected body that can do what our MPs choose not to do. It is the only realistic method available to us. It is sad to realise that our MPs and MSPs won’t help in this matter that is clearly so important to Scotland.
Christopher Bruce
Taynuilt
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel