WITH the General Election activity in Scotland now in full swing, it is already obvious the kind of tactics and strategies which are being adopted by the branch offices of the Unionist opposition parties in Scotland, as opposed to their head offices down south.
It is abundantly clear that in England the Tories are going to face a catastrophic defeat not seen since the post-war landslide of the Atlee Labour party and of course the arrival of the Blair era in 1997. Such a resounding defeat of the Tories down south should of course be replicated in Scotland, should it not? This, including the total wipeout of the Tory party north of the Border, should be a done deal, but will this be the case?
READ MORE: SNP to request indyref2 if they win most Scottish seats, John Swinney confirms
You have to look closely at the strategy being pursued by the Unionist parties in Scotland in what is a Westminster General Election. It is quite clear that the tactics of the Tories, Labour and the Liberal Democrats is to “play the Holyrood card”. This is to clearly deflect attention from the disastrous policies of the Tories across the UK and the complete absence in the Labour and LibDem manifestos of anything related to Scotland.
As a result, at every gathering of these parties – be it at the hustings on the television, radio or talks to the press, or in fact social media – their strategy is to attack at every opportunity the SNP performance at Holyrood instead of indicating what they as a party are going to do for Scotland at a national UK level.
This is obvious from the approach of the Tories in Scotland, who are soon to have a leadership vacancy. Douglas Ross and his so-called “Scottish Conservatives” have spent years suggesting that they are different from their Westminster cousins to the point that they believe they are a different party. In fact, his modus operandi is never to talk about his party’s attitude to Scotland and the disastrous policies which have impoverished our nation. His approach is to completely savage our independence aspirations at every turn, and offer nothing by way of policy that will lead to prosperity for Scotland.
READ MORE: SNP launch General Election manifesto with pledge to 'deliver independence'
His desire to remain a Westminster MP at any cost says it all. He has no interest in even making devolution work, and is happy to support any policy his English Tory party conjures up, even if it impoverishes Scotland even more.
The history of the Labour Party in Scotland says it all. For years, this party provides the Scottish electorate with hollow promises of increased prosperity and being at the centre of the Westminster decision-making. Here once again, Anas Sarwar attacks the SNP’s record at every turn, promises the earth and kids us that they are a left-of-centre progressive party.
This quasi-conservative party need to find a new name, as Labour is now a complete misnomer. Their national policy is “a fit” for England and their prosperous “south east”, and does nothing for Scotland. Anas Sarwar the Labour spin doctor shouts the need for “change”
but cannot explain what this will be. If they succeed in Scotland by converting their two Westminster seats into double figures, those MPs will simple “disappear” into the huge 400-plus of the ruling Labour party never to be seen or heard from again and never talking about the issues that directly affect Scotland. I have seen this happen repeatedly over the last 50 years. There is no such thing as Scottish Labour, only the Labour party in Scotland.
In relation to the LibDems, this clearly English-based party make polices they will never have to deliver in Scotland and remain a tactical voting haven for disaffected Tory and Labour voters. Only the SNP can look after Scottish interests and the future can only be secured with independence.
Dan Wood
Kirriemuir
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel