THE long letter from Alan Walker (Jun 8) contained so many of the carefully planted ruses of the Unionists that I was surprised that it was published at all.
Nobody had even heard of a unilateral declaration of independence (UDI) until a breakaway group in the state once named Rhodesia succeeded in breaking the chains England had bound it with, as it had so many before it too. But these were white supremacists, nasty nasty.
We’ve been taught that UDI is an untouchable thing, dirty, looked-down-upon, despicable, and yet we use it every day.
In a shop they offer goods, and we buy or decline of our own free will, we don’t ask permission for either course, we take that decision “unilaterally” and “independently”.
READ MORE: Next prime minister 'must face pressure to devolve indyref powers'
This might seem flippant, but it happens where the law is involved too.
You can remove yourself from a marriage, a mortgage, a rental agreement, a work contract, WITHOUT seeking permission from the other party. There may be a price to pay for that, but you’d be free nonetheless.
These, then, are clear demonstrations of Unilateral Declarations of Independence.
We can do that with the 1707 treaties, but don’t.
Alan is an engineer, and knows full well that being told indy support is at 50% does not mean that indy support actually is at 50%, and he knows, surely, that 98% of our news comes from Unionist biased sources.
Being brought up in a constant stream of propaganda makes it incredibly difficult to see.
Who told Alan that our European neighbours would not recognise us as a country? You guessed it, the Unionists did. By the way, Scotland is a country. No-one will deny that and anyway, it only takes one other independent country to acknowledge that fact, but there will be many.
READ MORE: John Swinney defends SNP ditching 'independence' on the ballot paper
Who told Alan that only a referendum with better that 50% of the vote would win us independence? Aye. You guessed it, and it is a lie.
It is a lie in more than one dimension, Alan. The UN Charter of Human Rights is quite clear. A country HAS THE RIGHT to govern itself.
Nowhere in that august document is a vote or a referendum mentioned, but the propaganda we’ve been subjected to has drilled those false facts into us. So, it really is a lie.
Alan, perhaps like many, thinks that voting for independence and winning that vote delivers independence. But that is not true either.
And here is the truth of unintended consequences.
Alan, and many others, assumes that after such a vote independence magically descends upon our land.
But it doesn’t.
READ MORE: Patrick Harvie: I'll 'probably' always be an independence supporter
The very small print, if he cares to find and read it, would tell him that such a win will only enable our politicians to approach England and ask them to let us go.
Alan already knows what that response would be.
Under no circumstances will England relinquish its hold on Scotland, which can be found embodied in the texts of the 1707 treaties.
The simple truth is that either signatory can exit those agreements without discussion. That – although being the absolute right of either party – would be called UDI, and it seems Alan would rather put up with what we have now than live with such a label tied to his name in a free Scotland.
Like Alan Walker, I too am a retired engineer. I worked on Concorde and our aim was to reach for the stars, not cower beneath the self-elevated lords and masters from that other land.
Christopher Bruce
Taynuilt
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel