FIVE years ago, our streets were full of young people demanding climate action and justice. What must they be thinking now?
It was the first truly Global Climate Strike For The Future. It was vast, with more than a million young people taking part in what was estimated as at least 2200 protests and actions all around the world.
The remarkable day saw school students all across Scotland taking action here and standing alongside students in 120 other countries.
I joined the protests in Stirling, inspired by and soaking up the passion of people who were loud and clear and, most of all, determined. They knew they weren’t acting alone, this was a fight for their futures. It was a global movement facing up to the biggest and most urgent crisis we will ever face.
Young people in Scotland and beyond were justifiably furious that successive generations of politicians and decision-makers had utterly failed to take the steps and the action that are so necessary.
A 13-year-old who took action that day would now be 18. Do they have any more cause for hope? I fear that over those five years, there’s been even more equivocation and even more broken promises.
We need to ask: what kind of inheritance are we leaving the young people of tomorrow? Our world has just had its hottest year on record. Sea levels are rising faster than ever before. Wildlife is becoming extinct globally. That’s not the future that people were marching for.
Here in the UK, we have a Tory government that is urging the world to move on from fossil fuels while approving 100 new oil and gas licences and signing us up for annual licensing rounds. It’s not remotely serious. It’s worse, it is treacherous and dangerous.
READ MORE: Rishi Sunak's family firm signed $1.5B deal with BP before oil and gas license announcement
The task before us is staggering, but there are glimmers of hope. Some governments are finally starting to make the investment that is necessary, with huge clean energy investment programmes in Europe and the US. They are putting their money where their mouths are in a way that Westminster is refusing to.
Nobody thinks we can turn off the oil and gas taps overnight, but in the past five years, since those millions of people took to the streets, there hasn’t been anywhere near enough progress towards moving beyond fossil fuels.
We know exactly where continued inaction will lead. We have more data and more research at our fingertips than ever before. There are no end of simulations, scientific papers and books available that tell us what will happen. But none of them can help us if they are ignored.
Scotland played a central role in the industrial revolution. We are one of the largest fossil-fuel producers in Europe. We have a particular responsibility to show how a just transition and a renewables revolution will work.
We are taking steps in the right direction. The growth of our green industries has been one of our proudest achievements – with a 50% increase in renewables jobs in 2021 alone. It shows what can be achieved by a determined government and a willing industry.
Having the ability to transform our broken energy sector and to turbocharge the shift away from oil and gas has always been a key part of my reasons for supporting independence. How can we fully deliver such a bold vision within the huge limitations of devolution?
But waiting for independence is not enough. The young people on our streets five years ago wouldn’t accept that excuse, and nor should we. Somewhere among those crowds were the leaders of tomorrow – we have to ensure that they are given as good a starting position as possible.
Scotland can lead the change. We absolutely must continue the drive for independence, but, in the meantime, and with the clock ticking louder every day, we also need to ensure that we are stretching every sinew of devolution to deliver for our climate.
READ MORE: Lesley Riddoch: PMQs is a farce. If the SNP won't walk out, they need a strategy
We have to be honest. We are not moving fast enough, and myself and my Scottish Green colleagues are impatient. In the time I’ve been in parliament, I’ve heard lots of big promises and targets, but they mean little without concrete plans to implement them.
The last Scottish Climate Act passed world-leading targets in 2019, but it was not backed up by the action needed to deliver, especially in areas like agriculture and transport.
We have seen recent progress, especially with new ambitious plans for home heating, but we are still a long way from delivering all the actions that are truly needed if we are to meet our net-zero targets by 2045 or earlier.
Those young people who put down their pens and walked out of their classrooms five years ago were under no illusion about the scale of the challenge ahead. And nor am I. We must see action and we must see change.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel