JEREMY Hunt’s UK Autumn Statement, delivered in Westminster yesterday, was a disaster.
We already know that the amount of the new money he allocated to Scotland is way less than is needed.
We also know that Hunt’s National Insurance changes can only make management of the Scottish tax system more difficult, as if he has no interest in supporting devolved taxation.
Difficult as these things are, though, they are not the real reason why this Autumn Statement was so terrible for Scotland. That real reason is the consequence of four things.
The first of these is that despite the National Insurance giveaway yesterday, the overall rate of tax paid by most people in Scotland will increase as a result of this Autumn Statement. That need not be the case.
READ MORE: Ofgem announces increase in average energy bill of £94 a year
Hunt could have chosen to cut taxes for most people whilst increasing taxes on those with wealth. That way he could have provided a real stimulus to the economy, whilst cutting inequality that would, though, have gone against every Tory principle, so he was not going to do that.
Second, austerity is returning. The only way that Hunt could justify the tax and National Insurance giveaway that he made yesterday was by delivering lower levels of borrowing in the future. He is reducing borrowing by planning to spend less on public services.
It is true that some core activities, like health and education, are supposedly exempted from such cuts. But, the consequence of that is that the austerity to come in other services might be at least as bad as it was under David Cameron and George Osborne from 2010 until 2015. If you think services are bad now, things are going to get very much worse.
Third, as my calculations have shown, there is also a plan to cut government investment in the economy by 16.7% over the next five years. Although we glaringly obviously need more investment in social housing, flood protection, the green transition, the rebuilding of schools and hospitals that are impacted by failing materials, and so much more, less money is going to be made available for these purposes. That is quite staggering.
Fourth, there was the reaction of Labour spokespeople to this Autumn Statement. It was obvious to every single commentator who spent much time reading the budget documentation that this Autumn Statement is a plan for economic failure. Its sole real purpose is to booby-trap Labour when it comes into office. It does this by challenging them to adopt it, terrible as it is. And yet, none of those Labour spokes people would acknowledge that, or address the issues arising. They are all so terrified of making a spending commitment of any sort that they would rather say nothing instead of talking about what really needs to be done. In that case it seems all too apparent that Labour shares the Tory aspiration to fail. I strongly suspect that they will succeed in doing so.
All of this created an unusual problem for me. I rarely have a problem with going to sleep. I know that is good fortune. I sympathise with everybody challenged by insomnia. Last night, I got a little insight into what it is like to toss and turn, and to fret and worry whilst despairing about the options available, none of which appear to be good, because that is what I did until too long until the night.
We have a UK economy that is failing. Very largely it is doing so because of the actions chosen by politicians, or their beloved appointees at the Bank of England.
READ MORE: UK monetary union 'malfunctioning' after Scotland agrees new deal
It is politicians who say that we cannot tax wealth more.
It is politicians have chosen to impose taxes on those least able to pay them.
It is politicians who have said as a result that we cannot afford to spend on essential public services.
And it is politicians who refuse to understand that the so-called national debt is nothing more than private savings deposited with the Government, because people wish for the security that government savings accounts can, alone, provide.
It is because of the incompetence of these politicians, most of whom were taught on one particular degree course at the University of Oxford, that we as a country face catastrophe. Their dogmatic refusal to imagine alternative economic models to the market based absurdity of neoliberalism that they were taught in the youth is what is condemning us to this mess.
This morning I have an overwhelming feeling that Scotland needs another plan. To be candid, I think the UK as a whole shares that need. The trouble is, no one has got close to writing it. What I have, somewhat reluctantly, asked myself as a result is whether or not I can now avoid having a go at writing that plan. After all, how much worse do things have to get before I am left with no choice but give it a go?
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel