RECENTLY I’ve had a health issue and had to have various procedures and scans to assess the problem.
Now I am waiting for an operation, which will be in a few weeks’ time. Next week, I meet the surgeon and then have a pre-op. As I read of the consultants and junior doctors’ continued strikes in England over pay and conditions and the NHS there being eroded and underfunded, I am very grateful to live in Scotland and that I don’t have to worry that consultants or doctors are on strike here. It’s bad enough waiting a week for test results.
I’m glad my three grown-up children don’t have huge levels of student debt to pay off. I’m glad that Scotland is at least trying to protect health care for all and the NHS. I’m glad that under Alex Salmond, Scotland developed its renewable potential. I’m also grateful that Nicola Sturgeon prioritised babies, nursery and childcare – with baby boxes (below) and a child payment uplift because she recognised that you can forget the next 15 years at school if children get off to a bad start in life. I’m glad Scotland wants to protect food safety (but worry we won’t be “allowed” to).
Yes, the Scottish Government made errors over the ferry procurement – but at the same time, the Queensferry Crossing was a success story. I’m certainly grateful to live in a Scotland where most people prioritise a wellbeing economy, where all children deserve fair opportunities; where people value equality and a greener Scotland.
The trouble is, Scotland doesn’t have the levers to achieve this or a modern democracy – all it can do under the devolved settlement is to tinker at the edges.
In a federal state, the central government has clearly defined roles – federal roads, foreign police – and they don’t have to “allow’ the states to do anything! This confusing and unworkable devolved UK system is a mess and not used anywhere else. In a federal state, the central government doesn’t “allow” the states broadcasting rights, immigration laws, or Vat rates. Each state has its own laws for starters. I lived several years in Chicago and it surprised me greatly that major decisions were made at the local level (though I am aware that things in the US are not perfect by any means). I also didn’t realise back then I should be a proud Scot. So many Scots are also totally ignorant of our own heritage and history.
The UK system is like a parent and child – where Whitehall will only allow the Scottish people certain rights over our own lives if it so chooses. The British state, since its inception, has been fixated on centralised control, of the supposed “stability” of the Crown in Parliament. Whatever happened to the sovereignty of the Scots people?
I’m proud Scotland has leading universities and innovative scientists, I’m proud Scotland has major international festivals and a successful creative community of artists and musicians. I’m proud Scotland has a wealth of resources – whisky, quality food and the potential to be a world leader in renewables. But even while most Scots want better equality and democracy, we don’t have the devolved levers over the economy to achieve this – and sadly, Scotland is one of the most unequal and exploited nations in the developed world.
Like many Scots, I wasn’t taught to be a proud Scot at school – but to feel second-rate to London and its history. Just as in Northern Ireland where children are taught about English rivers, but not about their own Irish rivers! The MSN Unionist media may try to claim the British state celebrates its diversity, but it’s a hollow front as it has also suppressed other cultures and languages. Our diversity can actually make us stronger, not weaker.
The Union believes in a mono-global culture. In the 1800s, European countries realised to harness their real potential, they must have national renewal and national aspiration and the map of Europe changed from huge empires to the small nations of today. Scotland must join this Europe of sovereign, free nations in order to shape and control our future destiny.
We can still share security and co-operate on defence with rUK – independence just means that Scots voices have a say and not just a tiny Tory elite.
Name and address supplied
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel