SNP policy convener Toni Giugliano appears to be appealing to us in the wider independence movement to put our energy and effort into supporting the SNP, telling us that a failure at the polls for the SNP takes Scottish independence “off the agenda”.
Well the SNP leadership should be seeking advice and learning lessons from the wider indy movement, not preaching to us.
READ MORE: Scottish independence 'off the agenda' if SNP lose General Election
The loss of support for the SNP recently is directly related to failures within the SNP leadership which demonstrate that the administration was in a right mess. We all now know it was incompetent, and the jury is out on whether it was worse than that.
We also know that Nicola Sturgeon – who is an excellent political communicator, probably the best in Europe – failed us by assuring us that there were no problems with the party finances instead of dealing with the problem. Nicola also took us on a dead-end road to independence by making an appeal to the English Supreme Court, which gave us an English legal interpretation of Scottish sovereignty which has no basis in Scottish history and which is invalid.
READ MORE: Believe in Scotland: Days of action, congress, and strategy meeting
So the SNP leadership gave the Scottish people a very poor example of maladministration and took us down a dead-end road to independence which led us into a box canyon.
Now Humza Yousaf, who was not helped by the previous leadership and was kept in ignorance of vitally important issues, has been trying, with some success, to get the SNP out of the mess he inherited. He has made some good moves, but has a long way to go, particularly in bringing the SNP into the wider indy movement where they should be playing a leading role.
The old SNP leadership should be a bit less self-assured in preaching to the wider movement and much more prepared to work with, and learn from, the movement. If they do this, and open up their vision to include all parts of the indy movement, then they will earn the respect of most of us and we will support them at the ballot box. However, fixing dates for SNP meeting on important dates for All Under One Banner activities is not a good way to start.
Andy Anderson
Ardrossan
IT was noted that last week Alister Jack attempted to bully the head of the civil service to not allow any civil service staff to work in the department of Scotland’s Minister for Independence.
Fortunately the civil service refused to be dictated to in this manner, when permanent secretary John-Paul Marks made it clear that it was the job of the civil service in Scotland to support appointed ministers – telling the Finance and Public Administration Committee that it has been “well understood” that under devolution that the civil service for the Scottish Government “serves the Scottish Government and their priorities”, adding that the constitutional debate was not “theoretical” and is a “here and now reality”.
READ MORE: Nicola Sturgeon: 'I literally had no idea who Alister Jack was'
Asked what his response was to Mr Jack (who also happens to be my MP, as well as Secretary of State for Scotland), Mr Marks told the committee: “It is for the First Minister to appoint his ministerial team, given his priorities, and that ministerial team is then voted on by this parliament. Then it is for the civil service to serve that ministerial team with impartiality”.
In recent weeks we’ve also seen other unprecedented attacks by politicians from London-based parties on Scotland, and on our elected elected government in Holyrood. We had Alex Cole-Hamilton, the leader of the LibDems in Scotland, stating that Scotland “can never and should never ever exist again [as a nation]”, during a debate on independence in Oxford.
READ MORE: Scotland 'can never' exist again, says Scottish LibDems leader
And, of course, we have the leader of the Labour Party in London making it clear that not only does he support the UK’s Brexit to the full, he is not even remotely interested in rejoining the European single market, but prefers to continue with policies that have (and will continue to) inflict great harm on Scotland, where a clear majority voted against Brexit in every parliamentary constituency.
They used to be quite good at pretending to love us, whilst hiding their disdain. However, it has become increasingly clear that, regardless of which group forms the Scottish Government in Holyrood, it will not be possible to take devolution any further for the benefit of the people of Scotland. The London-based parties, and the lackeys representing them in Scotland, seem determined to not merely deny support to Scotland, but to actively do us down.
The Westminster cabal abuses Scotland at every opportunity – and no longer deems it necessary to hide behind any mask.
Ian Waugh
Dumfries & Galloway Indy Hub
ONE can’t defend Margaret Ferrier’s actions, but it does seem she is being more harshly treated than Boris Johnson and other miscreant MPs. Also, it is wrong for Labour to claim that she has neglected her Rutherglen constituents when Hansard research shows that over the past 12 months she has made many more Westminster contributions than Labour’s sole Scottish MP.
Ian Murray’s disgraced predecessor, Nigel Griffiths, was found guilty by the then Parliamentary Commissioner for Standards, Mrs Elizabeth Filkin, over the misuse of his constituency office allowances but was let off any punishment by the Labour-dominated House of Commons standards and privileges committee. Elizabeth Filkin resigned after pressure from some Labour MPs who effectively hounded her out of office as it was felt her standards were too high for New Labour.
Fraser Grant
Edinburgh
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel