WHAT is it about so many politicians that makes them so willing to ignore the state of our environment and the climate crisis?
Why is it that time and time again, when any measures are suggested to help us tackle the biggest danger to our children’s futures, we are left facing opposition at every turn?
Last year, it was about single-use plastic, today it is about the Deposit Return Scheme (DRS).
Tomorrow it will no doubt be about something else.
The scheme is very simple. We will pay a 20p deposit when buying a drink, but once we are finished with our cans or bottles, we can simply take them to one of the thousands of return points that will be available and then claim 20p back.
This week, my Scottish Green colleague Lorna Slater announced that the company that produces 95% of all drink containers made and sold in Scotland has signed up for the scheme.
READ MORE: Alex Salmond 'knew of Humza Yousaf schedule clash 10 days before vote'
This is a huge step forward for recycling and our environment. Just imagine that the next time you look into the drinks fridge in your local shop. Almost everything you see will be covered by our scheme.
Everyone can see the cans and bottles that are blighting our streets and our communities and the desperate need for this scheme. Right now, 34,000 plastic bottles are littered every day in Scotland alone. The scheme will change that.
Each and every time we go outside, we can see the evidence of the UK’s throw-away culture. The cans in the streets and in our rivers, the bottles smashed and discarded around our parks and on public transport, the discarded rubbish on our beaches.
From our city centres to our housing estates, our mountains to our seas, cans and bottles are discarded across the country when they could easily be reused.
It is part of the tidal wave of litter that has blighted our communities for too long.
The DRS will do so much to change that. It will allow us to reclaim our streets, clean up our communities and force those that profit from this mess and pollution to step up and show some genuine responsibility.
The opposition has been predictable and coordinated.
READ MORE: Caledonian Sleeper service to be taken into public ownership
Right-leaning politicians and profit-driven corporations have been all too happy to behave like lemmings leaping into the sea rather than face up to their responsibilities.
I’ve spent more than a decade in politics and this scheme is the most important single action that any Scottish Government has taken to save the environment.
I am exceptionally proud that it is being delivered by a Green minister.
It is why our Parliament voted so overwhelmingly to set it up three years ago. It is why so many environmental groups and campaigners are so excited.
It is an ambitious scheme and will be a turning point for our relationship with recycling. I am confident that it will provide a model for how successfully deposit return schemes can operate across the UK.
This policy has been years in the making. It has been scrutinised and adapted, delayed and changed and had funding made along the way to support businesses who, despite having vested interests, needed help in adapting to a better way to deal with their waste.
Yet even those attempts to work with and support the small business who asked for the DRS have been weaponised by opponents. They have chosen half-truths, misinformation and panic over constructive engagement.
Then there is the Internal Market Act, a legal process introduced by Westminster to effectively veto some of the most important decisions MSPs take at Holyrood.
You cannot help but conclude that the Tories are attempting to vandalise this and other schemes put forward by our government, to undermine and erode the authority of our parliament, devolution and our democracy.
There has been a lot of speculation about Westminster considering a veto on this scheme. To do so would be to ride roughshod three years after it was approved by Parliament and after businesses have invested hundreds of millions of pounds. This would not just be bad for the environment – it would threaten our democracy.
A mere stroke of Alister Jack’s pen would destroy hundreds of jobs and be devastating for those who have invested and got ready. It would undermine our efforts to save the planet. And anyone who stands with him would be equally culpable.
The idea that the Tories would put political interest before the climate crisis, the most urgent danger we all face, is perhaps nothing new. We have witnessed time and time again how countless Tory governments at Westminster have wreaked havoc on Scotland.
Yet this is different. This isn’t just about the litter on our streets, the glass in our parks, the jobs that could be won or lost, or the threat to democracy. This is about our children. Because if we are stopped from recycling, what hope is there to make even greater changes that are needed to save the planet?
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel