THE ever-reliable Gerry Hassan hits the nail firmly on the head yet again when he explores just what the Queen’s Platinum Jubilee means to her apparent subjects in the UK ("Just what are we celebrating when it comes to the Queen’s Jubilee?", May 30).
As an avowed Republican, I must confess that, in my view, the Queen and her dysfunctional family represent an anachronistic, privileged and entitled picture of the UK. As the economy teeters on the brink of recession and ordinary people struggle to pay fuel bills, food bills and generally keep their heads above water, the celebration of the Platinum Jubilee does, as Mr Hassan observes, take on a dark, sinister and damaging guise.
The Westminster government will welcome the distraction to divert attention from its serial failings and the daily bungling of their mendacious and shameless leader through a frequently utilised “bread and circuses” strategy that a largely right-wing, xenophobic media is only to eager to support.
Of course there are still people here in Scotland who back the Queen and the royal family for misguided religious reasons, loyalty to the Union or due to historical ignorance. Their antediluvian, forelock tugging fealty to the Queen and her assorted panhandling hangers-on remains a mystery to me and many others, including, it would appear, Gerry Hassan and the witty Ms Shona Craven.
The comedian Mark Steel summed up this bewildering allegiance to the Crown by many who lived in poor circumstances or had the most challenging lives during the Second World War: “A bomb fell on my home in London and I was trapped under the rubble for hours with two broken legs and a shattered arm when the Queen came round visiting the area and spoke to me for five minutes. And you know, that was the happiest day of my life …”
This unquestioning subservience to the royal family appears to continue in all social classes to a degree, though it is clear that the monarchy forms the apex of the class system and all the transparently gross inequalities that lurk within it can never disguise that monarchy murders meritocracy. As Mr Hassan states, much is made of the queen’s so-called apolitical role, yet this must surely now be utterly discredited following the disclosure of the continued use and abuse of the arcane procedure of “Queen’s consent” that allows her to vet the contents of literally hundreds of bills to ensure that her personal wealth and private interests are protected, irrespective of the undemocratic implications and reality.
“Queen’s Consent” reeks of naked self-interest and breathtakingly hypocritical entitlement and, sadly, the Scottish Government has colluded in this charade to allow the royal family to abrogate responsibilities for environmental issues on their estates.
Yet, to criticise the avaricious behaviour and moral corruption of the royal family is completely taboo for many individuals and much of the mass media. Prince Charles’s recent “cash for honours” scandal was discreetly forgotten, Prince Andrew has been posted missing doubtless until he is publicly rehabilitated by his mother and extended family. The latest ersatz imperial visits by junior royals were excruciatingly embarrassing and overtly out of touch leading to requests for apologies for past empirical misconduct and anti-British protests.
The cost of maintaining “the Firm” is approximately £70 million annually and there are estimates of anything up to £30m to be spent on the Platinum Jubilee at a time of genuine privation for many UK households. This is morally unacceptable, totally inequitable and ethically obscene. As Gerry Hassan points out, a celebration of the Platinum Jubilee contains a deliberate sleight of hand that presents a very selective picture of the British Monarchy. Let’s hope that the days of unearned privilege and wealth are numbered as we move into a new age in an independent Scotland.
Owen Kelly
Stirling
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel