THE Tory Elections Bill, debated last week in the Commons, sounds on the surface like an anodyne piece of legislation, tidying up arcane procedures on voter registration, identification and how we vote. However, it is a full-fronted attack on the fabric of what passes for democracy and the right to vote, reveals the thin nature of fundamental rights in the UK, and the brazen reality that the Tories regard such rights and “the British constitution” as playthings that they can amend as they like to further their self-interest.
The proposed bill will mean that no-one will be able to vote in person without photo ID – a requirement which has never existed in the UK outside Northern Ireland. This is against no evidence of widespread voter fraud and impersonation, as there have been three prosecutions in the past five years.
The introduction of such measures will disproportionately hit certain groups – black and ethnic minority communities, poorer voters, and young people. It is not an accident that these groups don’t vote Tory in high numbers, leaving any fair-minded observer to judge that this is an attempt to restrict the franchise, engage in voter suppression, and disadvantage opponents to aid Tory dominance. Research by Channel 4 News showed this will hurt participation. Twenty-five per cent of black and ethnic minority voters said if challenged on photo ID to vote that they would consider not returning to vote; 3.5 million adults do not have a photo ID; 11 million don’t have a driving licence or passport. A proposal to allow councils to give out free voter IDs will cost millions.
READ MORE: Lesley Riddoch: Tory UK voter ID law will unfairly impact Scots
These plans will be aided by an attack on the Electoral Commission’s independence – a body which found that the Boris Johnson Vote Leave campaign had broken the law and investigated the secretive funding of Johnson’s Downing Street flat. Its remit will soon be controlled by ministerial diktat, which in this case will be Michael Gove, with the only accountability to a Speaker’s Committee – a Commons’ body with a built-in Tory majority.
This is what the Conservative Party has done through the ages to ensure its dominance: stack the system and manipulate it to further its hold on power. If the Labour Party dared to act in office in such an anti-democratic manner it would be attacked by the likes of Boris Johnson and the Tory press.
This is about the nature of the Conservatives, the manipulated democracy and wider political culture in the UK, which is ingrained and becoming worse. So deep-seated is the Tory sense of conflating party and national self-interest and what passes for democracy that attempts to make international comparisons of UK voter suppression with the Trumpian Republicans in the US or Putin’s authoritarian populism are just batted away.
Rafael Behr put it in The Guardian last week: “There is a corporate arrogance, in particular, around the Conservative Party which sees itself as so intrinsic to the fabric of British democracy, so densely wound around its foundations, that it could not logically be capable of undermining the structure.”
Discouraging millions from the right to vote to aid party advantage is small fry to today’s Tories, as is breaking electoral law to win elections, the serial offences of Vote Leave in the 2016 vote, and the power of dark money and lack of accountability and transparency in the party’s finances.
It doesn’t matter to the Tory government that principled Tories such as David Davies think this is an attack on democracy, or that trade unions, NGOs and charities are concerned about yet more Tory attempts to curtail such bodies engaging in campaigning during elections. Or that the Welsh Senedd has withheld its consent from the Westminster bill – something it rarely does – and that the Scottish Parliament has indicated its concerns. All of this is in the context of the longer story of the circumvented, controlled nature of UK democracy and how long it took to achieve an equitable “one person, one vote” which did not happen in 1928 as conventional accounts suggest, and even left-wing histories such as Paul Foot’s The Vote.
Rather, “one person, one vote” was only achieved across the UK fairly recently. First, in 1949 the Attlee government abolished plural voting across Great Britain by which university graduates and business people had two votes: the former even having their own specific constituencies. Second, it took until 1969 for Northern Ireland, until then effectively a one-party state under pressure from the civil rights movement, to abolish the abuse of plural voting in the province.
READ MORE: 'Total bollocks': Watch as SNP MP picks apart Boris Johnson's voter ID plans
Both measures happened because the labour movement and campaigners pushed to abolish these relics, and it is damning that the left do not know their own history. The UK has not and never has been a fully-fledged political democracy. Instead it is defined by a hesitant, incomplete progress towards democracy, the maintenance and defence of feudal rights and privileges (such as the House of Lords and Queen’s Consent) and the brutal reality that post-Brexit there is no such thing in the UK as any fundamental rights.
The people of the UK are not active citizens in their own land, but invited into public life on the terms of the elite and have to play by their rules. This openly partisan Elections Bill is designed to make such an undemocratic state as permanent as possible, and has to be stopped or worse will follow.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel