REGARDING independence, isn’t procrastination political weakness? We expect our SNP leaders to be proactive and decisive.
Like many of your readers I’m frustrated by the glacial pace towards indyref2. I’m sure, at least I hope, that plans and negotiations are proceeding in the background, but we simple souls are being kept in the dark. It is not a wise position because a pressure cooker can only take so much.
Take currency. It seems one of most acceptable options would be to rename our coinage the Pound Scots, initially in parity with Pound Sterling, and backed by a National Bank of Scotland. The change would not be daunting as there would be no new coinage to learn, as there was with decimalisation. An early decision on currency is essential.
Pensions. This seems fertile ground for the SNP to mine, as UK pensions are among the lowest in the developed world. Pensioners who were lied to in 2014 must be reassured that payments are safe, as they are to UK pensioners living in any foreign country. They must also be promised that pensions will quickly rise incrementally to EU levels after independence, guaranteed by the National Bank. An early decision will reassure pensioners.
What about the border? You can be sure the Unionists will play on people’s fears about visiting relatives and watching EastEnders! People need to know that citizens of the independent Irish Republic can visit the UK without hindrance, or indeed passports. They can even vote in UK elections, and this hasn’t changed with Brexit.
Would it not be a very vindictive English government to impose harsher restrictions on Scotland? I know that the border issue is not all under Holyrood’s control, but an early announcement about SNP border plans would be helpful.
I look forward to some definite decisions from the SNP. I expect the first of those decisions will be to announce the date of indyref2.
Richard Walthew
Duns
THE frustration over lack of progress is palpable, and understandable. But all those who think the SNP are no longer focused on independence are completely mistaken. While we all want to win a referendum this week, month, year or whenever, any and all plans have to take account of pragmatic reality. That is what Nicola and her colleagues are navigating through.
Plans have to be achievable, realistic and sustainable. Just because those who are already convinced demand a referendum and think independence is a done deal, this does not make it so. While the country is more or less evenly split the outcome is completely uncertain, and we must still convince enough undecideds of our case. And in the face of Westminster’s stance against a referendum we have to tread legally carefully. So there is no quick fix or win, regardless of understandable emotion. Internal squabbling and demands for instant referendums do not convince those we must convince.
The lesson from 2014 is that the case is winnable, but to do that we must avoid foot-in-mouth comments and provide factual answers to woolly questions such as currency. Internal divisions and public spats over when is the right time are counterproductive. The time is only right when all the pieces are in place. While the SNP are the ones in a position to deliver a referendum, undermining the necessary strategy based on the current constitutional, pandemic and Brexit situation is unhelpful and counter-productive.
But ultimately, engaging with and convincing the wider public is largely up to the wider Yes movement, not just the SNP. Those arguing for a referendum now should think how they are going to achieve one and at the same time convince the doubters.
Nick Cole
Meigle, Perthshire
THE questions to which those aspiring to come to Scotland to live have to supply answers make for depressing reading (Do you know the answers to these practice questions on UK life?, June 9).
I would like to see all the Members of Parliament for English constituencies plus the English members of the House of Lords rounded up without prior warning, shut in an examination room, and given 45 minutes to answer the relevant questions. That would include all government ministers, who after all, are responsible for this shambles.
I would hazard a guess that at the end of the time allowed fewer than half of them would have made the 75% pass mark.
George M Mitchell
Dunblane
WELL done to Natalie Don MSP – the newly elected SNP MSP for Renfrewshire North and West – on her maiden speech in the Scottish Parliament. Her speech focusing on poverty was excellent, highlighting the impact it has on individuals, families and communities, contrasting the imposition of poverty on so many people in Scotland in contrast the billions of pounds squandered by the UK Government on items such as nuclear weapons.
But more importantly, Natalie highlighted that no matter what the Scottish Government may do to try
to offset the worst excesses of successive Tory governments, we can’t abolish poverty in Scotland until we have the real powers of an independent nation.
Devolution is only a stepping stone – we need independence to tackle the scourge of poverty and to escape the immoral policies of the Tories.
Cllr Kenny MacLaren
Paisley
IT seems strange that Tory poltroon Liam Kerr would attack the Greens for supporting a phased shutdown of the North Sea oil and gas sector. Him and his Tory buddies have been saying it’s about to run out for the last 40 years.
Alan Hinnrichs
Dundee
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules here