“FOOTBALL is the most important things of the least important things” (Jurgen Klopp).

I WAS reading the various reports of Scotland’s hugely disappointing performance against Ireland in Paris on Saturday night. We’d been told that four years of planning had gone into producing a side – hungrier, meaner, more tactically savvy – that could produce when it really mattered. Instead, it was a total humiliation and we left the tournament not with a bang but a whimper, falling to pieces tactically, mentally and physically and we exited Saint Denis after being flattened by an Irish juggernaut that, in truth, barely got out of second gear, and mostly because it didn’t have to. We’ll always have Paris. But not in a good way.

READ MORE: O'Mahony aims savage Scotland dig after Ireland World Cup triumph

Saturday night’s disappointment apart, I wouldn’t dream of making any contribution to the on-field debate. I’ve never played rugby. But the tournament has really drawn me in. I mean, regardless of the result or your allegiance, how could you not be moved by 50,000 Irish people in Paris singing Zombie? There ought to be a Gaelic word that encapsulates the words “gutted”, “gallus” and “goosebumps”. In your head, zombie.

At some point after Ireland scored their third try on Saturday night, the camera panned to Princess Anne. She looked mightily scunnered. To be fair, it seems she takes her role as patron of the the SRU seriously. But I wonder – what sort of subliminal message does it send to the players and the nation when the patron of your team is the sister of the unelected head of state of a different country? What even is that?

The SRU have a hashtag: #asone And yet, in 2014, a group of ex-Scotland players came out for Better Together, which just proves that you should never meet your heroes. And I’ll guarantee these are the same folk who will always say politics and sport shouldn’t mix. To be honest I’ve watched every Scotland game ever since through that duplicitous prism. It was like when Alex McLeish became our football manager and came out for No. Jings, if you don’t believe in Scotland, why should your players? And why should I? I’ve never quite been able to decouple the manager’s views from our failure to qualify for a major tournament. We boast, then we cower.

READ MORE: Scotland must keep core group together, says Fagerson

It ultimately comes down to self-belief. I remember being at a football game against Ireland at Parkhead, Glasgow just after the 2014 referendum. We’d just bottled the chance to be normal. You may possibly remember that event. The Irish weren’t slow to let us know, and that was bad enough. We then played England, who told us to stick our independence up our arse. Cheers for the sentiment lads, but, by voting No, we’ve already done so. In an epic act of self-harm, we’d become the first country in the history of the world to be offered the chance of self-governance and then turned it down. We boast then we cower.

Scotland losing to Ireland on Saturday night may be the most important of the least important things, but it still matters. There were many factors at play. But the biggest one – the pride of playing as an independent nation against one who doesn’t get have the confidence to embrace self-determination – should not be discounted. “We can still rise now”. But right now it’s later than we think and our future as an independent Scotland needs more than the faux 80-minute nationalism of a sultry Saint Denis night. Allez Bleu.

Alec Ross
Stranraer

LAST summer, The National reported on the BBC being criticised for featuring the anti-abortion “hate group” ADF on The Nine (June 28). This referred to The Nine interviewing a representative from the so-called “Alliance Defending Freedom”, a USA-based group that the Southern Poverty Law Centre has designated as a homophobic hate group and that has played a significant role in American women losing their right to reproductive healthcare. The ADF was supposedly providing the “other side” to the debate about buffer zones around abortion clinics.

It appears that the BBC has not learnt from the public outcry, as they interviewed the same organisation for BBC Scotland News to get their perspective on the buffer zones bill now being progressed through the Scottish Parliament.

READ MORE: Bill to create abortion clinic buffer zones published at Holyrood

Is it truly so challenging to find someone who opposes safeguarding vulnerable women from harassment that the BBC needs to turn to American hate groups? This is not about silencing different opinions but the irresponsible act of platforming an extremist group, unchallenged, at the expense of we, the licence fee payers.

Furthermore, Texas-based 40 Days for Life, the group behind the clinic protests we are witnessing in Scotland, has vowed to sue the Scottish Government if this legislation (which is supported by more than 70% of people in Scotland) is passed.

The interference from the American religious right in our democracy should be a cause for concern, and it would be preferable if the BBC, instead of promoting these organisations, would challenge them and hold them accountable.

Is this too much to expect from the state broadcaster which we all pay for?

Gemma Clark
Paisley