CRAIG Dalzell has told us that Scotland has been undersold in the issuing of new wind farm licences by many billions – more than enough to settle all of the current pay disputes and greatly improve services in health, care and education (Mistakes have been made – here’s what to learn from them, Feb 11). This is a very serious charge against the Scottish Government which requires a detailed answer.
Craig argues the Common Weal line that a state-owned national energy company should be established. He explains how without cost, the energy sector could be nationalised in a decade or so. Norway gives us the obvious example of the state controlling the production of oil over the past few decades and amassing a fund of $1.2 trillion. Scotland has lost out to corporate profits (currently at obscene levels while we shiver) over these years but Craig gives us a way forward to capture these profits for the state for the future. After all, wind power will go on forever.
READ MORE: SNP leadership election: Kate Forbes bids to unite independence movement
The Scottish Government has claimed not to have had the power under devolution to follow Norway’s example. Recently, however, the Welsh government have adopted the Common Weal policy and are establishing a national energy company. If they can do it under devolution, what’s stopping our government? Is the lobbying by the private giants of the energy sector too convincing or convenient for our representatives?
We need answers from our government. Why are they not adopting this suggestion to benefit the Scottish people?
Campbell Anderson
Edinburgh
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel