Mark Wood finished with five for 46 as England dismissed South Africa for 183 on the third morning in Johannesburg, strengthening their grip on a series-clinching victory in the fourth Test.
England took lunch at the Wanderers with a formidable first-innings lead of 217, enough to enforce the follow-on for the second game in a row, though Joe Root instead opted to bat again and allow his seamers a well-earned rest.
Wood was richly deserving of one, having claimed his second five-for in Test cricket, both in his last three appearances. Resuming with three of the top six already in the bag, he cleaned up top-scorer Quinton De Kock for 76 then had last man Dane Paterson caught behind.
De Kock had earlier shared a stand of 79 with Dwaine Pretorius to give the South African cause a semblance of resistance, but England’s bowlers were once again too good to be kept out.
South Africa began the day on 88 for six and lost another to the fifth ball of the day, Chris Woakes earning a thick leading edge from Vernon Philander and watching as the ball looped gently to Stuart Broad at mid-off.
De Kock and Pretorius frustrated England for over an hour-and-a-half, the former turning his existing 32 not out into a fourth half-century of the series. Pretorius also did well, driving cleanly to take advantage of Root’s attacking fields and reaching a new personal best of 37.
It took the introduction of Ben Stokes to end his stay, feeding a rising delivery to Zak Crawley at gully before Wood wrapped things up at the other end. De Kock was beaten on the drive, with a touch of sideways movement enough to slip between bat and pad and flick the bails.
If Wood was too much for De Kock, then number 11 Paterson had no chance, stepping away to leg and nicking off to Jos Butter.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules here