A motion calling for a review of the in-house legal and secretarial function of the governing body will be voted on at August’s Annual General Meeting of the Scottish Rugby Union.
The backdrop to this is the tension between the Union (consisting of member clubs which is the governing body of the game of rugby in this country) and Scottish Rugby Limited (the wholly owned subsidiary which is responsible for running the business). In an ideal world, these two organisations would work together for the benefit of the game at all levels in Scotland, but in recent years there has been a growing disconnect between the Union’s member clubs and the paid executives of the limited company.
If the motion is voted through, the SRU Council – elected by the clubs to oversee the whole organisation – will be charged with looking into “the efficacy, efficiency and propriety of the in-house legal and Secretarial function of the Scottish Rugby Union” and be asked to consider “the relative advantages and disadvantages of continuing such functions in-house when compared with outsourcing to a third party or third parties, in part or in whole”.
The motion has been proposed by Haddington RFC and seconded by Currie amid concerns that there are conflicts of interest within the current set-up which has led to instances where the needs and wishes of member clubs have not been served and/or the reputation of the Scottish Rugby Union has been negatively impacted. A number of examples of this are cited in the motion, including a lack of oversight of executive pay details at Board level which led to uproar when it emerged that Chief Executive Mark Dodson had pocketed £933,000 in salary and bonuses for the financial year up to 31st May 2019.
As previously reported, two other motions will also be voted on at the AGM. The first is to replace Super6 with an inter-district championship. The second calls for full transparency with regard to how the Scottish Government’s recent £20m Covid bail-out for rugby is spent.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules here