Martin O'Neill praised Celtic for doing what they had to do by defeating Heart of Midlothian at Tynecastle on Saturday evening.
After a goalless and fairly turgid first half, Celtic turned on the style after the restart with goals from Kyogo Furuhashi, Nicolas Kuhn and a double from substitute Adam Idah making sure the Hoops went three points clear at the top of the Scottish Premiership standings.
Aberdeen - who had been matching Celtic up until now - lost to St Mirren. While traditional title rivals Rangers could only draw against Dundee United.
That created the perfect scenario for Celtic going into their 7.45pm away clash, and former manager O'Neill believes the manner his old club won the game in the end sets them up perfectly for their midweek UEFA Champions League meeting with Club Brugge.
Read more:
-
Hearts vs Celtic delayed as assistant referee suffers injury
-
Brendan Rodgers thrilled as Celtic capitalise on rivals' slip-ups
Reflecting on Celtic finishing victorious on their travels whilst their rivals slipped up, O'Neill told Sky Sports: “Well, it’s a great couple of hours for Celtic with Aberdeen losing and Rangers drawing at home and Celtic winning away at Tynecastle. Really terrific.
“First half. I thought Hearts did well, but we mentioned at half-time we didn’t need encyclopaedic knowledge to know that Celtic would create chances in the second half of the game.
“Hearts ran out of steam, but obviously, eventually they looked like a side that was struggling. Really just couldn’t get a chance to make it 2-1 in the game as well. A big, big chance for them and they couldn’t take that one.
“A side that has got really no confidence, if you’re not scoring enough goals, and they certainly haven’t. We mentioned it before they’ve only scored five from open play this season. That’s incredibly bad.
“And it was a struggle for them in the second half. They tried to take a couple of risks and Celtic were going through them towards the end. But it’s as if it’s a struggle for them all season.
“As for Celtic, a great away performance in the second half. And what a way to line up for the Champions League game coming up midweek.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel