THE Alba Party are calling on Uefa to release the audio recordings between match officials which led to the controversial decision not to award Scotland a penalty during their clash with Hungary.
On Sunday night Scotland were defeated by Hungary 1-0 in their final group match of the Euros, putting an end to the country’s run in the competition.
However, before the 100th minute goal by Kevin Csoboth, Scotland midfielder Stuart Armstrong appeared to be brought down inside the box by Hungarian defender Willi Orban.
Argentinian referee Facundo Tello decided not to give a penalty and the VAR official appeared not to encourage Tello to consider a replay of the tackle which thwarted Armstrong’s run on goal.
During a press conference after the match Scotland manager Steve Clarke said it was “100 per cent a penalty” and asked “what’s the point in VAR if they’re not going to come in on something like that?”.
Now, the Alba Party have called on Uefa to release the audio recordings between match officials and the VAR referee.
The party’s general secretary Chris McEleny was at the game in Stuttgart and urged Uefa to release the tapes in the interests of transparency.
“This was a match of huge importance to millions back home and tens if not hundreds of thousands of travelling Tartan Army supporters,” he said.
“Scotland might not have put in the performance we are capable of but we would’ve been in the driving seat towards the knockout stages if we had been awarded the penalty.
“Everyone in the ground thought it was a penalty.
READ MORE: Stephen Flynn reveals who he'll support at Euros after Scotland defeat
“Everyone watching at home in Scotland thought it was a penalty and 70% of people across the UK polled thought it was a penalty.
“In the interest of transparency, Uefa should release the conversations between the officials to reassure football fans across Scotland, and Europe, to explain why the only two people that thought Scotland should not have been awarded a penalty were the match referee and the VAR referee.
“If a mistake has been made, it is right for Uefa and the match officials to own up to it not simply hope that they get off Scot free.”
It comes after former Premier League referee Mark Halsey told Online Poker that he felt Scotland should have been awarded a penalty.
“I think Steve Clarke is right to want answers from Uefa and the Uefa chief referee officer Roberto Rosetti on the decision not to award Scotland a penalty,” he said.
“When the incident happened and Stuart Armstrong went through, I thought it was a penalty straight away.
“The reason why it was a penalty was because Armstrong was just in front of the defender, and when you get an attacking player in front of a defensive player chasing back, there’s going to be contact, and 99.9 per cent of the time it’s always going to be a foul.
“I’ve seen people say Armstrong had hold of the defender’s shirt but the only time he did that was when he was fouled and already going down.
“You can clearly see the defender’s knee goes into the back of Armstrong.
“For me it was a clear penalty and a clear and obvious error from the referee.
“Yes, things happened so fast – but that’s why we’ve got VAR, so I was surprised VAR didn’t recommend a review.
“I’ve watched referee Facundo Tello a few times, he’s a good referee but I’m sure when he reviews his performance he will be disappointed that he didn’t award a penalty, and I thought he was too trigger-happy with his whistle last night.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel