BRENDAN Rodgers has dismissed suggestions that Celtic’s opening goal against Rangers at Ibrox on Sunday was a “freak” occurrence and hailed “king of the lost cause” Daizen Maeda for typifying how he wants his team to approach games.
The Scottish champions got off to an incredible start in the cinch Premiership match against their city rivals in Govan last weekend when they took the lead just 21 seconds after kick-off.
Japanese internationalist Maeda chased down a Joe Hart punt into the hosts’ box early on and netted when an attempted James Tavernier clearance ricocheted off his shins and spun beyond Jack Butland.
READ MORE: 'You never know' says Tierney as he rates Celtic return chances
But Rodgers - whose team stayed a point in front of their nearest challengers, who have a game in hand against Dundee at Dens Park to play, at the top of the table after drawing the third derby match of the 2023/24 campaign 3-3 – does not believe the bizarre strike was an “accident”.
He is keen for his players not to give their opponents a second on the ball in their own half and argued the goal was both the outcome of their high pressing strategy as well as the energy and persistence of his winger.
“If he doesn’t have the intent and the ambition to go and win the ball then their full-back either goes back to the keeper with comfort or he gets turned and plays forward,” he told Celtic TV.
“But our idea is always to attack the game, even when we don’t have the ball. That was typified in no better way with Daizen. He is the king of the lost cause. When it looked like it was maybe gone and he couldn’t quite get there, he got there, made a great block and gave us a great start in the game.”
Rodgers, whose team will play Rangers at Parkhead after the top six split is made, stressed that he thought his side played superior football than their rivals at Ibrox on Sunday and insisted they had deserved to come out on top at the end of the 90 minutes.
READ MORE: Celtic midfielder pips Rangers and Hearts men for award nod
“I really enjoyed it although we were disappointed not to win because I thought we were much the better team up until their penalty,” he said. “We were the team that played the football, were controlled and some of our play in the first-half was outstanding, while dealing with the long ball that they play.’
“So through to half-time and the beginning of the second-half we were excellent in the game. You expect something from Rangers, being at home, and I thought they got a bit of a leg-up with the penalty.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel