Livingston boss David Martindale insisted his midweek quip about being “gutted” at Derek Adams leaving relegation rivals Ross County was not intended as a personal attack.
Martindale explained that he simply wanted the “unhappy environment” at the Dingwall club to fester as long as possible.
The Lions are six points adrift of the 11th-placed Staggies at the foot of the cinch Premiership.
In an interview with BBC Scotland after Wednesday night’s defeat by Kilmarnock, Martindale was asked how he viewed the departure of Adams, who rubbed people up the wrong way with some of his press conference comments during his ill-fated 12-game stint in charge.
The Livi boss smiled wryly: “My honest thoughts? I’m gutted, there you go.”
At his press conference on Friday morning ahead of Saturday’s Scottish Cup trip to Championship side Partick, Martindale expanded on his response to Adams’ County exit.
“I made comments after the Kilmarnock game that probably in hindsight were a wee bit disrespectful to Derek but I want to put that into context,” he said.
“I think it’s common knowledge Derek was unhappy being at Ross County, I think his previous press conferences tell you that. Scottish football’s a goldfish bowl and it’s common knowledge the players were unhappy.
READ MORE: Kettlewell relishing 'proper' Morton vs Motherwell cup tie
“So you had an unhappy manager and unhappy players and of course it is better for Livingston for that unhappy environment to remain.
“Ross County having unhappy players in the changing room and an unhappy manager who is perceived to not want to be at Ross County, I would rather that situation remained. I’m not going to sit here and tell lies.
“So I was gutted that they made that change, or Derek made that change, because ultimately the more negativity at Ross County the better it’s going to be for ourselves. But I need to focus on Livingston rather than Ross County.
“That’s just to give my comments after the game a wee bit of context. I wasn’t just being disrespectful in terms of Derek.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel