ATTEMPTS to bring the Tour de France back to the UK in 2026 appear to have received a shot in the arm from the success of the UCI Cycling World Championships in Scotland.
Tour director Christian Prudhomme was in Glasgow last weekend for the men’s elite road race, fuelling speculation that a bid to host the Grand Depart of the world’s biggest bike race – with an opening stage starting in Edinburgh – is making serious progress.
Officials insisted Prudhomme was on a private holiday but his presence at these "super worlds" – the first running of an experimental format combining 13 disciplines – was seen as significant as work continues on the bid, which was first launched in 2021 with Government backing.
READ MORE: Keir Starmer denies division between UK and Scottish Labour
British Cycling chief executive Jon Dutton greeted Prudhomme in Glasgow, and said the success of the championships, which attracted an estimated one million spectators across Scotland over 11 days, were a powerful advert for what the UK could offer.
“Why wouldn’t event organisers want to bring events to the UK on the back of everything we’ve seen?” said Dutton, who worked on the Yorkshire Grand Depart in 2014.
“We know ASO [the Amaury Sports Organisation that runs the Tour de France] have huge respect for our ability to deliver major races. I think the UK wants to have more moments like this and the Tour and other events would be on that trajectory…
“The Tour is the biggest commercial road race in cycling so it would be great at a point in the future to bring that back and I think any event organiser looking at this event would certainly want to come back to the UK.”
Glasgow served as the hub for the worlds, but there was mountain bike racing in both Fort William and Glentress Forest near Peebles, para-cycling in Dumfries and Galloway, and road time trials in Stirling.
Trudy Lindblade, chief executive of these championships, said: “We’ve got communities that have not ever been part of a major event before, they’ve really celebrated that civic pride of having a global broadcast.
“In Stirling or Dumfries we were something big, something for the first time, part of history essentially.
“I’d like to think we have given some future hosts of some cycling events good consideration of how you can do things and maybe do things maybe slightly differently.”
The majority of the fans who did turn out were delighted to see Great Britain top the medal standings in both cycling and para-cycling, with a total of 100 medals across all events – 66 of them coming for the Great Britain Cycling Team in the key events with the rest in non-funded disciplines.
The Great Britain team have often been down the standings in the final world championships before an Olympics, holding some performance in reserve, but a change in the calendar means these worlds have been a full year before Paris rather than a few months.
British Cycling performance director Stephen Park promised there was still more to come.
READ MORE: John Curtice: Greens deal is not to blame for SNP drop in polls
“It’s more competitive now and riders are more eager to be winning year-in, year-out,” he said. “They’re far less comfortable being in a position where we’re keeping all our powder dry for that final big push for the games.
“Also, because the margins are so much smaller now around equipment and performance gain, we need to be able to give riders confidence that they’re going into Paris … knowing if they deliver their best they’ve got every chance of winning.
“For sure we will still be looking to take a step up when we get to Paris, without a shadow of a doubt, but at a big world championships we’re making an effort to ensure we’re not sending our athletes out with knives to a gunfight.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel