SCOTTISH Rugby chairman John Jeffrey has called on the country’s leading teams to develop the kind of hard-edged, winning mentality that took his own side to the Grand Slam back in 1990.
Speaking at the governing body’s annual general meeting and at a subsequent media conference at the weekend, Jeffrey admitted that, notwithstanding the odd exceptional result, last season had been a disappointment. Scotland’s men only won two games in the Six Nations, while the women’s team and the under-20s lost all five matches in their Championships. And although Edinburgh showed promise in their first season under new head coach Mike Blair, both they and Glasgow failed to get beyond the quarter-finals in either European competition or in the United Rugby Championship, with Warriors coach Danny Wilson having been sacked at the end of the season as a result of his team’s poor performances.
“As my headmaster used to say in my end-of-term school report, ‘Could do better’,” Jeffrey said. My father scored out the ‘could’ and said ‘must do better’. What I will say today is we WILL do better.
“For the most part our high-performance teams have flattered to deceive. We had some fantastic individual results, but a lack of consistency is frustrating for all our supporters. We need to develop a ruthless streak that is evident in all successful sporting environments.
“We have to be better at every level. We’ve invested an awful lot of money in all our high-performance teams and we need to get a return on that. We need to be stronger.
“We need to develop a winning edge - all our teams need to develop a winning edge, and when we get into positions in games where we could be winning them, we should be winning them. We’ve got to see them out. We’ve got to deliver a harder-edged mentality to all our performances at international and high-performance level.”
Having remained involved in rugby as an administrator, Jeffrey is well aware that it has changed almost beyond recognition since he was a player, and knows there is no simple panacea for the Scottish game’s problems. But he suggested that one problem for the current generation of players was the lack of experience of real life in other contexts outside of rugby.
“I’ve got to be careful in this, because I don’t want to sound like one of the old fogeys - it’s 30, 40 years ago since I played,” he continued. “What I would say is that the players nowadays have come up through a different environment. We were in amateur days when you had your day job, you learned all your skills in your day job, you learned leadership.
“What I would say to these players is: Where do they develop their leadership skills, their hard skills? Because they’re coming up, and let’s not kid ourselves, they’re well catered for. They’re given sports conditioning, training, everything, all the way through. So where do they get that hard edge to learn?
“And also with coaches, the water-carriers come on with instructions. So where I would come from is . . . It’s always been a big bugbear in the last few years - how do we develop leaders? How do we make leaders on the pitch so that they can make decisions which are immediately happening on the pitch?
“Because I spoke to a couple of coaches about it and they said to me, actually, the bizarre thing is, by the time they get the message down to the water-carrier they’re on to the next stage of play anyway. So they’re probably given them advice about what they should have done two moves ago, not that move.
“I think some of these young boys coming through - a lot of them look to have that edge that you’re talking about. And - I hope I’m wrong in this - I think maybe our coaching, our academies, develop that out of them, coach that out of them.”
Last week England head coach Eddie Jones blamed private schools for producing players who lacked “resolve” and experience of leadership - opinions for which he was rebuked by his employers, the Rugby Football Union. Asked if he agreed with Jones, Jeffrey insisted he just wanted as many young people as possible playing rugby - and didn’t care what kind of school they went to.
“We’ve got very small numbers playing our game, and I don’t care whether they’re at private school, grammar school or whatever,” he added. “We’ve got to look after every single one of them, develop them - and if the private schools are coaching them every day and doing that, then that’s great. They’re part of our academies, so I’ve no problem with any of that.
“But the more kids we have playing, the better. I don’t care which structure it is.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel