HIBERNIAN
OFIR MARCIANO 6
Not much he could do with Rangers’ two goals. Made a couple of smart stops to keep his team in the game.
PAUL MCGINN 5
A tough afternoon for the defender. Struggled to match the pace of the Rangers attack.
PAUL HANLON 6
Had a couple of headers from corners that went close to finding the back of the net. Defended well.
RYAN PORTEOUS 6
Enjoyed renewing his rivalry with Morelos. Fought well and was impressive when playing out from the back.
JOSH DOIG 7
Had a good battle with his opposite number Nathan Patterson. Got up and down the left flank throughout.
MARTIN BOYLE 7
His pace caused Rangers problems as he tried to get in behind at every opportunity. Booked for simulation in the first half.
JACKSON IRVINE 6
Always keen to get his foot on the ball and was strict positionally when on the back foot.
JOE NEWELL 7
Set piece deliveries a real plus point for Jack Ross’ team. Looks a talent with the ball at his feet too.
ALEX GOGIC 6
A typical battling performance in midfield but was poor in possession. Offered little when he had ownership of the ball.
CHRISTIAN DOIDGE 5
Frustrating afternoon for the striker as he struggled to hold the ball up.
KEVIN NISBET 8
Kept the Rangers defence busy throughout the 90 minutes. A fine header to grab a lifeline for the away side.
SUBS
CHRIS CADDEN (FOR DOIDGE, 65) 4
Got up and down the right flank when introduced in the wingback role.
KYLE MAGENNIS (FOR IRVINE, 80) 3
Battled well in the dying stages.
MELKER HALLBERG (FOR GOGIC, 83) 2
On too late to make an impact.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel