JOHN HUGHES has hailed the appointment of Jack Ross as Hibernian manager, believing him to be the second best man for the job...after him.
Hughes joked that he should have got the nod for a return to Easter Road as boss, but he has faith in Ross to use his experiences at Sunderland to get the Hibees moving back in the right direction.
When asked if he thought Ross was the obvious choice for the role, Hughes said: "No, I think I was!
"Jack is very conscientious in the way he goes about his business and he has the fantastic experience of being down at Sunderland. I think that when you see them now, they got rid of him a little too early. They should have given him a chance.
"All managers want time but he will still look back on that experience and, even now, feel that it stands him in good stead. He will probably still want to be in there, taking Sunderland up, but he will believe that the experience will stand him in good stead.
"So it was a fantastic appointment, a very good appointment. But he needs to get his own team in there and that will take him two or three windows."
Hughes believes that Ross may look to men that he already knows well to bolster his Hibs squad, and players who know the club. And he thinks that the club will back their manager in the January transfer window.
"Hibs can get into the top six and then Jack needs to look higher," he said.
"I have always seen Hibs as a top four club, getting into Europe and getting runs in the cup and if you don’t do that, you always have to be in the top six. I think Jack will do that and if he is bringing in the kind of players I am assuming he will, just listening to bits of conversations, I can see that.
"If it is the likes of (Dylan) McGeough and (Marc) McNulty then he also has the experience of seeing those players down in England.
"I think Hibs are at the stage where they can back him. I think they run a tight ship but I think they will know that they do need two or three. Saying that, one or two might have to go, as they shuffle the pack."
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules here