A CALL has been made for an investigation into why one of main opposition groups to the Assisted Dying Bill was allowed to set up a stall in the Parliament last week under a different name.
Care Not Killing staffed a stall registered under Logos Scotland at the Edinburgh building to coincide with the consideration of the Assisted Dying for Terminally Ill Adults (Scotland) Bill.
“This week’s stall has one clear aim – promoting opposition to the assisted dying bill currently being considered at Holyrood,” said Fraser Sutherland (below), CEO of Humanist Society Scotland, who has written in protest to the Parliament’s Presiding Officer, Alison Johnstone.
“All of the people staffing the stall were employees or consultants of Care Not Killing, and the slogans on leaflets and signs gave every indication of their hostility to the bill.”
He added that the stall was actually listed as being hosted by Logos Scotland but their work wasn’t covered anywhere on the stall.
READ MORE: Scottish Government consultations are being 'manipulated by bots to tailor results'
“In their application to the Parliament Events Team, Logos Scotland have clearly failed to declare their intention to host a stand on behalf of another organisation, Care Not Killing,” said Sutherland in his letter.
“In doing so they have neglected to indicate the substantive focus of the stall itself.
“In my view, this is a deliberate and underhand attempt to circumvent the rules governing member-sponsored exhibitions in Parliament.”
The stall was sponsored by failed Tory leadership contender Murdo Fraser, above.
The rules around such stalls state that “the content of an exhibition should be agreed with your sponsoring MSP”.
However, when asked by the Sunday National if he was aware of what exactly the content of the stall would be when he sponsored it, Fraser said: “No, I wasn’t – and nor would I expect to be. I was merely the sponsor of the stall, but I understand that in this instance Logos Scotland partnered with Care Not Killing because of their shared interest in end-of-life issues.
“As far as I know, neither organisation has exhibited in the Parliament within the last two years, and no rules have been broken.”
But Sutherland told the Sunday National: “Questions certainly have to be asked as to why Parliament and MSPs were kept in the dark about the real aims of this exhibition regarding a live bill.
“This would appear against the long standing principle of lobby groups not having undue access to parliamentarians during bill procedures and ensuring transparency.
READ MORE: Family pay tribute to woman who died in crash that also killed four horses
Such a move sets a dangerous precedent for the Scottish Parliament on allowing lobbyists direct access to MSPs during the legislative process.
“The submitted information by Logos clearly fails to declare their intentions to lobby MSPs votes.
“Not only was it dishonest to Parliaments staff who have to take this into consideration but to their sponsoring MSP and other members of parliament.”
However Care Not Killing maintained they had abided by the rules and Shona Haslam, chief executive of Logos Scotland said she had been unable to attend the stand due to family illness.
She added: “We work closely with Care Not Killing on end-of-life issues and campaigning for better palliative care in Scotland.
“There are more MSPs in Scotland than palliative care doctors and we welcome any opportunity to bring these issues to the attention of parliamentarians.”
A Scottish Parliament spokesperson said: “The rules set out by the Scottish Parliamentary Corporate Body do not prevent organisations holding exhibitions related to live legislation. The Presiding Officer will respond to the Humanist Society Scotland shortly.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules here