This essay is from the book 10 Years of a Changed Scotland, published by The National to mark 10 years since the 2014 referendum. Copies are available to pre-order here for just £7 excluding postage.
IN 2014, I was a bright-eyed journalism student. I had left school at the end of fifth year, feeling unfulfilled by rural Fife life and seeking purpose. I was lucky enough to spend most of my time writing about the Yes and No campaigns, talking to activists and learning about Scotland’s political history. It changed my life forever.
I do not generally write about my personal life, but to provide some context: I’m the child of two English parents, who hail from traditionally Labour north-east England. My great-grandparents were miners. My grandmother bought the Mirror every day. Moving between England and Scotland during my childhood, I did not grow up with a sense of “Scottishness”. Loch Lomond did not play at the end of family weddings. I was more familiar with Geordie than Scots. I did not spend much (if any) time prior to the year of the referendum contemplating what it meant to be Scottish, or considering the Union’s various pros and cons.
READ MORE: How would Glaswegians vote on Scottish independence 10 years on?
So in 2014 I found myself suddenly thrown in the midst of the most engaging political campaign of my lifetime. Everything I thought I knew about the UK was thrown into question. I knew I detested austerity, food banks, unfairness in any sense – could it really be that the Union I’d barely even take time to register was central to the furthering of these injustices? Alongside my studies, I began a website for young people interested in politics, and an independence-focused zine, and sought to find a place for this big question to be explored.
On the night of the referendum, as the results rolled in, I sat on the steps of my friend’s Glasgow flat. Watching the lights go off in tenement windows as more constituencies declared No, I felt miserable. I said to my friend: I’m not giving up. I’m going to work towards the Scotland we deserve.
You may suspect that this is a made-up anecdote – I will be the first to accept that it has a touch of cheesy Hollywood film about it. But it’s true. Ten years later I am the editor of Scotland’s only pro-independence daily newspaper. It is a privilege that I have been able to keep that promise, and it’s something I’ve been reflecting on a lot as we approach this important anniversary.
READ MORE: Scottish journalist issues independence warning over 2026 election
Things have changed a lot since that night. There have, to say the least, been ups and downs for the movement. Right now, it is quite clear that we are in the latter stage. I have worked at The National for six years, and in that time watched the political landscape change shape in front of my very eyes. While support for independence remains around the 50% mark, the prospects of actually securing a referendum (or some other mysterious means of ending the Union) seem distant. But we can use this moment to propel ourselves forward.
As we mark the passing of a decade since a vote that changed Scotland forever, it is crucial to take the time to consider three things. Where we’ve been, where we are, and where we’re going. This is the central thesis of this publication.
I have been lucky to work with some excellent writers, academics and journalists from across the political spectrum in the production of this collection of essays. Readers of The National may not agree with every contributor, but at the very least I hope they will give you pause for thought. I wanted to bring together a range of voices – some more critical than others – to provide a proper and varied reflection on the situation facing the independence movement.
I’d especially like to take a moment to pay tribute to Richard Walker – who has contributed an excellent essay to this collection about how the Sunday Herald came out for Yes (and the eventual founding of The National). Without his work, there would be no National. Scotland would not have a media outlet which reflects the views of around half of its population. I am grateful for his exceptional journalism, and to have worked with him as I began my career. He really is one of Scotland’s finest.
As ever, thank you for your support for The National – and pre-order your copy of 10 Years of a Changed Scotland here.
This essay is from the book 10 Years of a Changed Scotland, published by The National to mark 10 years since the 2014 referendum. Copies are available to pre-order here for just £7 excluding postage.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel