You can sign up by clicking here to receive it in the free newsletter in your inbox every Thursday at 6pm.
COMPARISONS between Labour head honcho Keir Starmer and Tony Blair are stacking up almost on a daily basis. I wonder why?
On Wednesday, Mhairi Black said the Blairites are “well and truly back in charge” of Labour after Tony Blair praised Keir Starmer for “rescuing” the party.
Black also said Starmer should be “mortified” to receive endorsement from the ex-PM but that he had actually been seeking it from “day one of his leadership”.
Blair told the Financial Times that Starmer had shown “agility and determination” in remodelling the party. He added that he had saved Labour “from the brink of extinction” after Jeremy Corbyn.
He also mocked those who have been suggesting Starmer is a Blairite ...
Black (above) said: “This is an endorsement Keir Starmer should be mortified to receive, but the truth is it’s one he’s sought from day one of his leadership.
"Blair, whose legacy is that of the Iraq war and a shift to the right, is not someone whose endorsement should be chased or happily received.
“If it wasn’t already apparent from their staunch support of austerity and Tory-replica policies, it’s clear the Blairites are well and truly back in charge of the Labour Party."
READ MORE: Blocked Scottish children's rights bill returns with changes
In other news, union boss Sharon Graham also accused Starmer's party of being a “90s tribute act” on Sunday.
Writing in The Times this weekend, the United general secretary argued that under Starmer, Labour are "unwilling to give Britain the reboot it needs".
Referencing a string of recent U-turns from the party, including on workers rights and a previously promised wealth tax, she wrote: "Through its actions Labour is beginning to tell us whose side it is really on."
Responding to these comments, Starmer told reporters at an east London school: “The Labour Party is absolutely focused on the future, not the past, and the challenges that we will inherit if we’re privileged enough to go into government."
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules here