PAKISTAN’S independence was a key moment in the end of the British Empire - but it came at a bloody cost that has haunted generations.
On August 14 Pakistan will celebrate its 77th Independence Day, a day before India, with both countries marking freedom from 89 years of rule under the British Raj (1848-1947).
The campaign for Indian independence began with the Indian Mutiny in 1857-59, but grew in intensity following the Second World War.
READ MORE: Stone of Destiny students 'identified by British state moles in nationalist movement'
There were increasing calls for self-government to be introduced in return for the country’s wartime contributions in support of the British Empire and allies.
However, the Indian National Congress, mainly consisting of Hindus, and the Muslim League could not agree on the shape of the new state, leading to escalating violence between the communities and the threat of civil war.
Partition
In response, Britain decided that partition was the answer.
Admiral Lord Louis Mountbatten, the last Viceroy of India, announced that Britain had accepted that the country should be divided into predominantly Hindu India and mainly Muslim Pakistan.
However, it was not a simple process and led to many bitter disputes, violence and deaths.
The 1947 Indian Independence Act was passed on July 18 of that year, setting out that it would “make provision for the setting up in India of two independent Dominions”.
English barrister Sir Cyril Radcliffe, a man who had never even been to India, was given five weeks to decide on the boundary line between the two countries. It would later be known as the Radcliffe line.
The separation caused the biggest forced migration in history that was not caused by famine or war.
The Act repealed the use of the title "Emperor of India" under the British Crown.
It also ended all treaties with the Princely States of India, who were given the option to choose which country to join. Those states who chose a country at odds with their majority religion or failed to make a decision, such as Kashmir and Hyderabad, became the focus of bitter disputes.
READ MORE: FM wants unit to respond to misleading independence claims to be ready by autumn
Independence declared
After Mountbatten announced that independence would come into force on August 15 1947, British troops were withdrawn to their barracks, with responsibility for law and order handed over to the Indian Army - a chiefly British-officered force.
Mohammed Ali Jinnah, known as the founding father of Pakistan, declared in his historic radio address: “August 15 is the birthday of the independent and sovereign state of Pakistan. It marks the fulfilment of the destiny of the Muslim nation which made great sacrifices in the past few years to have its homeland.”
While both Pakistan and India have the same independence day of August 15, Pakistan celebrates a day earlier, with multiple theories put forward as to why.
Some suggest Mountbatten’s busy schedule meant that to speed things up he went to Karachi to transfer powers of governance to Jinnah on August 14, while another theory suggests it is a Cabinet decision that Pakistan should celebrate its independence before India.
Impact of partition
The partition meant that millions of people found themselves on the “wrong side” of the border, creating 10 million refugees as Muslims travelled to Pakistan and Sikhs and Hindus to India.
Around a million of these refugees were killed in a series of horrific massacres in the border regions between the two newly created states.
The violence that ensured included arson attacks, looting, and the rape, disfigurement and dismemberment of around 75,000 women.
Some of the worst atrocities took place in the Punjab, where an estimated 200,000 people were murdered.
Mountbatten was criticised for rushing the partition process without dealing with the migration and violence that marred the creation of the new nations and would have an impact for generations.
READ MORE: ‘People pick up on flip-flopping from Labour’, says Katy Loudon
End of Empire
Pakistan and India’s independence was a key moment in the history and decline of the British Empire.
India had been a cornerstone of the Empire and many colonies had been secured in neighbouring countries in order to protect trade routes for valuable commodities including tea, spices, coffee, gems, and textiles.
Britain’s withdrawal from Pakistan and India also was seen as setting a precedent in other parts of the Empire, hastening calls for independence from many other colonies under British rule.
Almost immediately after independence, tensions between Pakistan and India began to boil over, which would escalate into a number of wars between the two nations.
The first broke out over the princely state of Kashmir, where the Maharaja was reluctant to join either nation. Pakistan, therefore, sponsored an invasion aimed at annexing the state.
When the Maharaja appealed to India for help, it was granted on the condition Kashmir joined the nation. A bitter war raged across the state until a United Nations-sponsored ceasefire was called in 1948.
The Kashmir issue still remains unresolved to this day.
This is the fourth article in a new series exploring the histories of how countries around the world became independent from Britain.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel