"SPAIN, Germany, Russia – all are elbowed out. The marriage stretches from one end of the paper to another.”
This is Virginia Woolf writing in her diary about Edward VIII and Wallis Simpson on December 7, 1936.
No doubt the royal events of this weekend in London will spike stories from Ukraine, Afghanistan and Syria happening right now.
Woolf was correct to fret about Spain and Franco’s fascism; she’d noted the “docile hysteria” of fellow travellers, the Nazis, in 1935, during a three-day holiday to Germany. But what should the author do about the Spanish Civil War?
As Sarah Watling notes, Woolf “saw the lure of avoidance” and wrote that: “Intellectually, there is a strong desire either to be silent; or to change the conversation … and so evade the issue and lower the temperature.”
Same old, same old.
READ MORE: Sudan: Scottish family stuck amid conflict, says SNP MP
Watling’s book is subtitled “Following writers and rebels in the Spanish Civil War” and focuses on the experiences of women on the frontline that were both physical and intellectual.
As with the current political moment, there was an urgency to their dispatches; it was a time to take sides.
Consider Nancy Cunard – party animal, a modernist poet influenced by Eliot, an aristo hanging out with Scottish ambulance drivers in Barcelona. She was on the nose when she said: “The equivocal attitude, the Ivory Tower, the paradoxical, the ironic detachment, will no longer do.”
Unlike our current equivocating Prime Minister, you can’t imagine her shaking hands with the likes of Giorgia Meloni.
As for detachment Arthur Dooley’s statue of Dolores Ibárruri, La Pasionaria, overlooking the Clyde at Custom House Quay, is testimony to the fact that 65 Glaswegians rejected such attitudes. Unimpressed by Westminster’s policy of non-intervention they went to fight.
As with Watling’s Cassandras they knew the ovine impassivity of the majority would facilitate the Nazi threat.
Her women had serious intuition, their minds – like seismographs – were attuned to tremors in the European body politic. They knew they had to take a stand.
Watling tells us about Sylvia Townsend Warner, a Dorset-based Communist, a lesbian who immediately celebrated the frankness and freedoms of Republican Barcelona.
She would write for The New Yorker calling Britain a “mealy-mouthed” country for its policy of neutrality.
Then there was Martha Gellhorn from St Louis hightailing it to the Madrid frontline who thought “Nazi papers had one solid value: Whatever they were against, you could be for.”
Watling tells us Gellhorn developed “a literary voice that distilled outrage into unforgiving clarity.” She wrote with a cold anger.
Watling’s book is thus a corrective to those more publicised accounts from male writers reporting on the civil war. Ernest Hemingway and George Orwell are here, of course, but with the dial turned down.
More space is given to the likes of Jessica Mitford, Decca to her sisters, who rebelled against Diana, wife of Oswald Mosely, and the frightful Unity, an Aryan berserker who wore a swastika badge and was in love with Adolf.
Jessica decamped to Bilbao by boat in early 1937. She was 19.
The Mitford family agitated the government and Anthony Eden sent a destroyer to bring her home.
Those Unity types haven’t gone away. Watling muses that fascism may have been a refuge for “bored and undereducated young women” of privilege, the sort we see today advocating internment for protesters against the coronation.
Watling acknowledges that several of the women she profiles had “despite their unconventionality … certain safety nets of their class”.
She’s aware too that many had a significant degree of naivety about the horrors of Soviet Russia and Stalin.
She’s particularly fine on the question of confrontation or evasion when it comes to great evils, that writing in times of crisis is not for fence-sitters.
And she also notes a recent cartoon about the climate crisis and how that fence is now on fire.
The book’s cover design perfectly captures its contents: it’s a photograph by Gerda Taro, like Joseph Roth, a Galician Jew highly attuned to the eliminationist antisemitism of the Nazis.
We see a young lady in profile as she kneels on one knee, a Republican militiawoman in training. She wears stylish heels and in one hand aims a revolver.
The photo says if you’re faced with fascism get ready, aim, then fire.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules here