FOR some reason, timing is never on my side when big political events happen.
Like every Wednesday when my toddler doesn’t go to nursery, I was slouching in bed last week.
When I finally decided to pick up my phone to see what was up in the world, I was alarmed to see dozens of notifications of people in France asking me: “please tell us what is going on? Is Nicola Sturgeon really going? Why now?!”
This is how I first heard about Nicola Sturgeon’s decision to quit.
Then I rushed to the TV to watch her press conference – or rather, attempt to watch it, as my kid required every second of my attention and demanded that I sing Hey Diddle Diddle and The Wheels On The Bus.
The news came as a surprise, even if the First Minister has been saying for a while how heavy the responsibility to lead the country, especially during the Covid pandemic, was, and how the decisions she had to make still haunted her.
She also criticised on several occasions for the tone of the political debate in Scotland that was becoming more and more acrimonious, leading to more horrific abuse sent to politicians day in, day out, especially elected women.
So after the shock, I thought: actually, I am glad she has decided to go, and I am happy she was transparent about her reasons.
It is not every day that you hear a senior politician say that they have served their time and need to call it a day.
Generally, when they do, it is either because they have been forced out – then they can blame their departure on everyone and everything except themselves and their own actions which lost them their party’s support – or because they endured such a humiliating defeat that they couldn’t possibly look at voters without shame – like France’s socialist prime minister Lionel Jospin who was shockingly beaten into third place by the far right in the 2002 presidential election.
Because of the rarity of her decision, the First Minister’s announcement was widely covered in France too.
What was quite remarkable to see is the similarity of the comments made by the press: the consensus was that it was amazing to see a senior political leader understanding that they are not indispensable, so there is no use trying to cling to power at all costs.
“In Scotland, the emblematic First Minister Nicola Sturgeon resigns”, tweeted Edwy Plenel, the iconic editor of Mediapart, a left-leaning news and investigation website.
“After New Zealand’s PM, she is a fine example of sensitive politics, in opposition to masculine, virilist and unbreakable careers and posturing.”
Sandrine Rousseau, a Green MP who has long fought against sexism and misogyny in politics, echoed this analysis, tweeting: “#jacindaardern #nicolasturgeon – two women, and such a different relationship to power. Thank you, ladies, please don’t go too far, you still have a lot to teach us.”
OF course, there will always be hostile comments against the First Minister: unfortunately, France isn’t immune from culture wars, so some people are very happy that she has decided to go following the Gender Recognition Reform vote.
This wasn’t helped by the fact that newswires initially reported that the reason for her resignation was the controversy surrounding the law that has been struck down by the UK Government. They quickly corrected it after accusations of disinformation rained on them.
For many in France, Sturgeon is not only the face of the aspiration for independence, but a symbol of a modern, welcoming, inclusive Scotland, even more so after the 2016 Brexit referendum.
EU citizens certainly have a part to play in this: because the political leadership embraced all the citizens of Scotland, irrespective of where they came from. In return, a lot have become advocates for the country.
I will never forget her speech at the official opening of the Scottish Parliament in 2016, weeks before the EU referendum.
“We are one Scotland and we are simply home to all those who choose to live here.”
Simple words, but so impactful. They resonated in my heart, and made me think: yes, I want to be part of this country, and apparently the feeling is mutual, for a change.
This message crossed the Channel and was well received by the French. Recently, I was taking part in an event organised near the town where I grew up in the rural centre of the country.
The people who attended it, from all walks of life, all told me the same thing: “We always feel so welcome in Scotland. Brexit is a waste of time and money. What a shame that they have left the EU, but we’ll have them back if they want!”
In the French National Assembly too, Sturgeon was praised by parliamentarians sitting in the Foreign Affairs Committee.
After an hour of discussion with them, the chair of the committee, the late Liberal MP Marielle de Sarnez, said: “Thank you for your sincerity and your clarity. The Scots are lucky to have you. We are looking forward to visiting Scotland, we love your country a lot.”
Of course, this is not to say that Sturgeon leaves with an impeccable legacy.
Scotland is facing many difficult challenges that were not solved during her eight years at the helm: public services are suffering and people are feeling the full brunt of the cost of living crisis.
It is obvious that all the positive, inclusive speeches in the world won’t solve any of these issues: but in a world of division, where minorities are demonised, it is important that leaders stay firm on the important values of equality and fairness that Sturgeon has defended. I am very grateful that she remained faithful to those principles.
I LOOK forward to seeing what she is going to do next. What I hope is that her resignation will force us all – citizens, politicians, journalists – to face our hypocrisy.
We all like to jump on the feminist bandwagon and call ourselves champions of women, but we are unable to create an environment where women feel legitimate to access big responsibilities and remain in these responsibilities without being subjected to all sorts of abject threats.
We comment on their body, the length of their skirt, the height of the heels, their marriage, whether they have children, their age, when they just have fun with their friends… They are often portrayed as scheming witches or objectifiable, brainless go-getters who must have offered sexual favours to a man to get where they are. Who would want to inflict this on themselves?
Honestly, I wouldn’t want to go anywhere near public life while this is what I could face, especially as a Black, foreign woman.
So here’s to all the incredibly courageous women who dare to step up, own their own voice, stand in government and parliament and work to make the lives of those less fortunate better.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel