I SUSPECT not too many National readers tuned in to watch the TRT World Forum last weekend. Hosted in Istanbul and sponsored by the state broadcaster and government of Turkiye, it featured 100 speakers from 40 countries and the forum discussed food security, technology, security issues, potential collaborations and a host of other topics.
So far so worthy, but not so much different from the multitude of other international conferences, public and private which abound, gravely discussing the world’s problems.
However, this year’s TRT World Forum carried a distinction which elevates it onto a level above just earnest discussion and the craft of state promotion.
And that is that Turkiye and this conference were able to promote a genuine achievement which has made a real difference to the lives of millions across the planet. That achievement is the Black Sea grain deal, the one and only chink of light amid the darkness of war on the European continent.
The main speaker at the conference was Ukrainian president Volodymyr Zelenskyy but the platform also encompassed senior Russian representatives. And President Recep Erdogan of Turkiye can justifiably lay claim to the mantle of being the one world leader who has relentlessly pursued the path of peace and mediation in this conflict.
The “unprecedented agreement” on the resumption of Ukrainian grain exports amid the ongoing war is “a beacon of hope” in a world that desperately needs it, UN secretary-general Antonio Guterres said when the deal was signed in July in Istanbul.
READ MORE: Unionist Clubs Scotland dodges Electoral Commission fine with loophole
It was a UN plan but it was made possible by the position of Turkiye as the honest broker between the two warring parties. It allows the free flow of Russian food and fertiliser, and Ukrainian grain, onto the world markets.
As a result, the world food crisis has thus far avoided going the same way as the world gas crisis. In the absence of the Black Sea deal, the inevitable result would have been for us the inconvenience of an acute shortage of fertiliser in local garden centres and more seriously further hikes in farming and food costs, but for Africa, it could have heralded mass starvation across the continent with country after country unable to afford subsistence level food imports.
Instead of this chaos, there is now established in Istanbul the order of a flow of food trade, policed by the offices of the Joint Co-ordination Centre (JCC) which monitors the implementation of the deal.
In the JCC, Russian and Ukrainian officials work side by side with their Turkish and UN counterparts to keep the cargo ships sailing safely through the Bosporus Strait onto the Sea of Marmara and to international waters.
At the end of last month and, against the expectations of many cynical commentators, the agreement was extended for another 120 days and thus a global food apocalypse was averted once again.
“The initiative for safe transportation of agricultural products across the Black Sea has been extended for another 120 days,” Oleksandr Kubrakov, Ukraine’s infrastructure minister confirmed.
READ MORE: Fresh Aslef strike to affect cross-Border services in Scotland
“This decision was just taken in Istanbul. The UN and Turkiye remained guarantors of the initiative,” he added.
Since the deal took effect, “Ukraine has exported more than 11 million tonnes of agricultural products to 38 countries around the world”, Kubrakov said. “This is a significant amount, but not enough. The world market cannot replace Ukrainian agricultural products in the near future.
At the same time, it is possible to increase the amount of our food for the world,” he added. Grain prices fell after the deal was extended. Benchmark wheat futures traded in Chicago declined 2% to $8 a bushel while corn dropped 1% to $6.59 a bushel.
Meanwhile, the war grinds on and the death rate on both sides now numbers in the tens of thousands, Ukraine’s infrastructure is totally debilitated and the Russian army has been exposed as a decrepit paper tiger.
There is still no end to this disaster in clear sight. But all wars end in negotiation and this one will be no different. However, right now there seems to be little strategic imperative invested in restoring the peace by any of the world powers.
READ MORE: Rishi Sunak refuses to say UK will respect Scotland on human rights
As people across Europe shiver in their homes unable to afford sky-high fuel costs, we should be under no illusions that there are, as Stanley Baldwin once said, “hard-faced men who have done very well out of the war”.
And so it is against this dismal background that the Black Sea grain deal should be lauded and those who made it possible are fully entitled to their moment of congratulation at the TRT World Forum.
We are all in their debt and the fact that the western media are so busy covering the war that they seem to have little time to ponder on the prospects for peace does not diminish the importance of what has been achieved and what eventually this patient successful negotiation might lead to.
Istanbul bestrides the border between Europe and Asia, representing the boundary between the western and Islamic worlds.
But this Christmastide, a predominantly Muslim state also represents the dividing line between the grim reality of war and the flickering hopes for peace.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel