IF the words of 13th-century Scottish poet and prophet Thomas the Rhymer can be taken at face value, Scotland and England were cultivating simple agricultural strains of cannabis sativa at the time of Bruce and Wallace. Thomas imagined that “Scotland and England shall be one” when “Hemp is come and also gone”, lines subsequently interpreted as a prophecy about the British Union.
Thomas was wrong; by the mid-18th century, cannabis production in Scotland had become a highly regulated industry bound by specific agriculture laws and led by a highly dedicated workforce. Weed fields were everywhere.
Robert Burns, who confessed in 1789 that he would sit down to write “as I would sit down to beat hemp”, mischievously suggested that farmers who grew hemp a certain way while performing a certain ritual would see (over their left shoulder) the apparition of a human being “in the attitude of pulling Hemp”.
Farmers were told (in 1739) that “every person who shall sell” hempseed in Scotland “shall, together with the parcel, deliver to the buyer, in writing, an account of the parcel” and its weight/volume, the name of the farm and the year the crop was grown. Scottish hemp farmers weren’t permitted to grow, store, trade or sell “any mixed or damnified” hemp seed.
READ MORE: Change the law on medicinal cannabis or devolve the power to Holyrood, says SNP MP
The Society for the Encouragement of Arts, Manufactures and Commerce expressed a strong desire (in 1802) to promote and invest in Scottish cannabis production, offering gold medals and 50 guinea grants to farmers processing larger volumes of industrial hemp “for the use of our navy”. Their campaign specifically aimed to enhance “Scotland’s Culture of Hemp”.
An 1815 discussion about cannabis stated that “a small quantity of hemp was raised by every farmer in Scotland, for the use of his own farm” in the distant past, but was “scarcely cultivated in Scotland” in the early 19th century, despite being a massive international industry just 15 years later.
Industrial cannabis had already been bred for thousands of years to provide rope and fabric long before it reached these islands. Hemp can be grown in northern climates because it gets harvested before the low temperatures and unlimited dampness destroys the crop.
Even if hemp contained enough psychoactive compounds for recreational or medical use, all cannabis varieties grown in Scotland will generally die from exposure long before they fully flower.
Pollen evidence from specific sites strongly indicates that large quantities of hemp were being cultivated for industrial purposes in Scotland between 985 and 1270, and again around 1460. One site was probably producing significant volumes of cannabis for a century or more after 1593.
The British government at first actively encouraged cannabis cultivation in Scotland, which was being carved into a profitable home farm for the entire island and beyond. Less than a decade after the Jacobite Rebellion of 1745, the British ruling class passed a hemp and flax act “for encouraging and improving the manufacturing of linen in the Highlands of Scotland”. After 1787, Britain awarded funds for cannabis cultivation in Scotland before abruptly withdrawing financial support in 1833.
READ MORE: 'I no longer just have to cope with it': Can cannabis help MS patients?
Scotland’s weed needs were briefly improved when forgotten Scottish inventor Robert MacPherson created a device called “The Foot Maceine” for “Breaking & Beating Flax & Hemp” in 1763 – a remarkably early innovation predating virtually every significant breakthrough of the Industrial Revolution.
Before 1832, almost 20,000 people were employed in Scotland’s “linen and hemp” industry, almost twice the amount working with the same materials in England. In 1861 there were still only five “hemp factories” in the UK, but they had increased to 61 different factory sites by 1874, 12 of which were in Scotland. At different times in the 19th century, almost half of all US cannabis imports came from Scotland.
Farmers could even claim a cash reward from the Society of Arts if they produced certified evidence of their grow “along with 14lbs of the hemp […] delivered to the Society” by January 1803, as long as it hadn’t been “steeped or watered in any bog-hole” or mixed with “what is left of the former year”.
Seems fair.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules here