THIS Conservative Government's descent into red, white and blue desperation continues apace. The latest great idea to save the Precious Union (©Theresa May) is the oxymoronic, or possibly just moronic, Union Division, which sounds like the handle that a group of right-wing Rangers ultras would adopt as the name of their Twitter account, and probably is.
You cannot pretend that using the word “union” to describe a division of the army to be deployed in Scotland and Wales isn't a political move at a time when the issue of a second independence referendum is very much on the political agenda in Scotland, there is more interest in Welsh independence than there has ever been and due to Brexit there is increasing talk of a vote in Northern Ireland on Irish reunification.
READ MORE: Black Friday offer: Here's how to subscribe to The National for just ONE POUND for three months
There is greater political division in the UK than at any time in recent history and the response of the Conservatives is to create an army division called the "Union division".
There are a number of things to take from this development, not the least of which is that the Tories don't do irony. More seriously, it comes across as both desperate and vaguely sinister, a blatant politicisation of the armed forces and an implicit threat to those of us in the UK who seek to remove our nations from Westminster rule.
Like all Conservative attempts to fend off Scottish independence, this is essentially a cosmetic exercise in desperate futility. The Tories seem to be labouring under the misapprehension that the real reason so many people in Scotland seek to remove Scotland permanently from the rule of the Conservatives at Westminster and ensure that they can never dictate our country's future and its public policies ever again is because we don't have enough Union Jackery.
They hope that if they can only ensure that everything in Scotland under the aegis of the Westminster Parliament looks like it has been decorated in July by the members of a flute band from East Belfast, then Scotland will smile indulgently at the rampant corruption and creeping authoritarianism of the Johnson regime, its British nationalist Brexit which is deeply damaging to Scottish interests and its attempts to neuter the devolution settlement, and say, well I'll have me some more of that – it's got a Union flag on it.
The move hides a further weakening and diminishing in the size of the British armed forces – the new proposals will see another 9000 posts phased out. As SNP defence spokesperson Stewart McDonald pointed out, what service people really need is an improvement in their terms and conditions, not to be politicised in a blatant attempt to influence a democratic debate within the UK.
The British Government increasingly fetishises the armed forces and the Union flag, but once they leave the armed services, former soldiers, sailors and aircraft people are more likely than the rest of the population to struggle with addiction issues, mental health problems and homelessness.
We see a growing proliferation of charities like Help for Heroes and the annual obligatory poppy fascism, all of which are not a sign of British pride but of British shame and failure because these organisations have to step in to provide the cash, the care and the support that it is really the British Government's job to supply.
This piece is an extract from today's REAL Scottish Politics newsletter, which is emailed out at 7pm every weekday with a round-up of the day's top stories and exclusive analysis from the Wee Ginger Dug.
To receive our full newsletter including this analysis straight to your email inbox, click here and tick the box for the REAL Scottish Politics
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel