I’m not broken; Westminster is.
It is exclusive. We all know this – you just need to look at the gender imbalance of MPs, with backslapping and guffawing because at the last election we returned the highest percentage of women MPs ever. A paltry 34%. We’ve become so accustomed to the exclusivity of Westminster that it has almost become normal.
But then sometimes the unfairness, the exclusivity of UK politics is rammed home. On Monday, the Israeli energy minister was unable to access COP26 in her wheelchair. The UK environment secretary, George Eustice, was quickly sent out to defend the lack of accessibility at the UK Government event. Israel “didn’t communicate particular access needs” for their minister, he told us.
I mean, why would an international event need to be wheelchair accessible?
Taking it further still, the Commons decided to exclude MPs from voting who cannot travel for any number of reasons. Quite simply, I was disenfranchised and was unable to vote against the UK Government’s Budget, but more importantly, the residents of East Dunbartonshire were disenfranchised.
Why? Because I had a stroke.
Despite finding it possible to have a proxy voting scheme in place for all MPs during the coronavirus lockdown, Westminster now maintains that it is not possible to have a proxy voting scheme in place for members with ill health. We are assured that a committee is looking into voting arrangements, and that is of course welcome, but it doesn’t change the fact that I was unable to participate in last night’s proceedings for the sole reason of ill health.
READ MORE: Owen Paterson: Cries of 'shame' erupt as Commons votes to protect Tory MP
That is exclusive. And it may in part explain why a mere five MPs are disabled, yet 19% of working-age adults live with a disability, a figure that rises to 44% of pension-age adults. If it was reflective of broader society, Westminster should have 136 disabled MPs.
But it’s not, and one clear reason for that is the exclusive, antiquated procedures of the place. It’s a parliament that can provide me with a place to hang my sword, but no provision to vote from home.
I’ve been prevented from voting tonight on a UK Budget that will impact my constituents.
— Amy Callaghan MP (@AmyCallaghanSNP) November 2, 2021
Why? Because I had a stroke.
I'm not broken; Westminster is. pic.twitter.com/BSHHKEP0YH
When Ian Blackford stood up in the House last night to ask on my behalf for a proxy voting scheme, he wasn’t asking for something revolutionary. There was no suggestion that Westminster should become an entirely virtual parliament. No-one is saying that any MP, on a whim, could choose not to attend and just vote from home.
Ian was asking for a simple system to be put in place for MPs who cannot attend for legitimate health reasons. A system that would make Westminster procedures much more inclusive.
On Monday I pleaded with the House of Commons Procedure Committee to put in place a proxy system. I reiterate that call today. Please don't disenfranchise my constituents.
I’m not broken; Westminster is.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel