IT’S been five years since I last met the General. Seeing him again now I’m struck by how little he has changed. The moustache, as ever, is immaculately manicured. His fatigues and desert boots are spotless – for now at least.
On his uniform the shoulder patches depicting the flag of Iraqi Kurdistan and the word “Peshmerga” are reminders of the causes to which Major General Sirwan Barzani is devoted.
But it’s not just warfare at which the general excels. Along the way he’s become the managing director of Korek Telecom, a mobile phone operator in Iraq with seven million subscribers and estimated to be worth some $2 billion.
It’s also worth pointing out too that Sirwan Barzani is of course the nephew of the former president of Iraqi Kurdistan, Masoud Barzani, making him part of a political dynasty that has been at the centre of the semi-autonomous region’s politics for decades.
READ MORE: David Pratt: US and UK washing their hands of their roles in the Iraq War
But it’s neither business nor family that I’ve come to talk with the general about. As ever our chat is about soldiering, or more specifically, the Peshmerga’s continuing fight against the Islamic State (IS) group
Eighteen years after the US invasion Iraq today remains a place largely divided along sectarian and ethnic lines while the spectre of IS continues to haunt parts of the country.
The recent general election, the country’s fifth since the Americans were here only served to underline Iraq’s precarious position with competing Shia parties at loggerheads following the outcome
With the Sadrist party of influential Shi’ite Muslim cleric Muqtada al-Sadr taking the most seats there was much anger among his rivals notably the Iran-backed parties with links to militias accused of killing some of the 600 people who died in anti-government protests back in 2019.
While Iraq’s capital Baghdad and the country’s south around Basra remains locked in these inter Shia rivalries, elsewhere in the Kurdistan region of the north there are other fault lines shaped by the region’s volatile politics.
General Barzani and his Peshmerga fighters sit on one side of such a fault line facing off as they do against the continued threat of IS and acting as a bulwark against the growing influence in the region of the powerful Iranian backed Hashd al-Shaabi sometimes known as the Popular Mobilisation Forces (PMF).
Hashd itself is the umbrella organisation for the pro-Iranian Shia groups that have grown in power in Baghdad and the south and is viewed by many Iraqis – especially Kurds – as an instrument of Tehran’s foreign policy in the region.
It was not Hashd al-Shaabi however but the continuing threat of the jihadists of IS that was preoccupying the mind of General Barzani the day we met.
Just like the last time we came together our rendezvous was at the base of the “Black Tigers’ the name given to Barzani’s crack Peshmerga unit billeted near the Iraqi Kurdish town of Makhmour.
That name, Barzani tells me, comes from the radio call sign he used many years ago when he and his Peshmerga fought a more than decade long guerrilla campaign against Saddam Hussein’s regime from Kurdistan’s mountains.
As we talk, he takes me on a tour of the base which is as spotless and well-manicured as the general is himself.
Only the rusting hulks of a handful of ramshackle vehicles tarnish the apron of the parade ground all of them resembling something from a Mad Max movie.
“My collection,” Barzani announces, walking over to the vehicles captured by his Black Tigers from IS before they were put to deadly use as armoured car bombs for suicide attacks.
Before us sat a cluster of customised pick-up trucks and saloon cars, their box like angular shape bringing to mind a child’s drawing of a car and a result of the jumble of welded or bolted on metal plates designed to protect the driver before he delivers his deadly payload and blows himself and his victims to oblivion.
On the door of one deadly wagon Barzani shows me the stencilled insignia indicating a specific IS unit then turns to another which he explains has a very special feature involving a hatch that would have been bolted down from the outside once the driver was inside.
“It’s what you might call a guaranteed one-way trip,” Barzani tells me, a grin breaking out across his face.
TEN minutes later we are in a vehicle convoy of his own heading for one of the most strategic positions in the region that sits atop the nearby Makhmour Mountain.
As our cluster of jeeps turns off the main highway on to a dirt track that spirals up around the mountainside, I notice that front and back we are joined by two pick-up trucks each of which have heavy machine guns mounted and are packed full of Kalashnikov carrying Black Tiger Peshmerga.
Earlier in our talk the general had warned how IS are still very much active in this area and our additional escort along with Barzani’s own bodyguards kitted out with state-of-the-art weaponry was a measure of how seriously the general took that threat.
For much of the outside world the jihadists of IS might seem a thing of the past, a spent force after their ousting from the Iraqi city of Mosul and collapse of their so-called caliphate in neighbouring Syria.
But over the course of my recent time in northern Iraq especially in and around Mosul’s old city on the west bank of the Tigris River, the bomb blasted ruins stand as a stark reminder of the battle to defeat IS which was considered the toughest urban warfare since the Second World War. With Mosul’s liberation it was hoped that IS would shrivel and die but nothing could be further from the truth.
Passing through tiny hamlets on the way to the summit of Makhmour Mountain it was a sobering thought that here all around us members of active IS cells are still operational.
The landscape itself was worthy of such a sinister presence. It was a bleak, parched, forbidding place, the track up which we journeyed engulfing us in dust forcing the vehicles to occasionally pause to allow the dun-coloured cloud to clear for fear of plummeting hundreds of feet down the sheer mountainside drops that flanked the road.
Once on top, ensconced behind sandbagged fortifications and surrounded by mortar emplacements General Barzani explained the lie of the land beneath us.
He told too of how anywhere up to 200 IS members were active in the terrain below, setting roadside bombs, or setting up fake checkpoints dressed as Kurdish policemen or security forces before kidnapping locals for ransom.
“This is the Tora Bora of Iraq,” Barzani explained, referring to the cave complex in eastern Afghanistan which Osama bin Laden’s own jihadist fighters of al-Qaeda had made their own last redoubt.
In what had been long day, and with the light fading fast over Makhmour Mountain, Barzani departed to visit another nearby frontline position giving an assurance that his men would escort me back to the comparative safety of the main highway.
“I would not stay too long before leaving,” Barzani politely warned as he waved goodbye and I continued to take photographs.
“If you do, then with the darkness there is a real chance that you will bump into IS on the way down.”
Barzani’s Black Tigers are of course far from the only Peshmerga fighters to have come face to face in battle with IS. Just a few days after my encounter with the general I found myself again in the mountains of the Kurdistan region this time in Kirkuk province in the company of women from the Kurdistan Freedom Party (PAK)
As a Kurdish nationalist group PAK comprises mainly of Iranian Kurds who are integrated into Iraqi Kurdistan’s Peshmerga forces.
With their eyes on the prize of a free greater Kurdistan the women and men of PAK have found themselves fighting along a number of Iraqi Kurdistan’s fault lines these past years.
First and foremost, all are exiles from Iran whose regime they oppose and regard as their major enemy.
But in recent times the fight against IS which remains active has taken priority. When not fighting the jihadists, the women of PAK have also found themselves in battle against the Iranian backed Shia militia Hashd al-Shaabi, who they regard as a weapon of Tehran’s ambitions in Iraq, presenting as big a threat as that of IS.
Sarbakho and Atusa are two of the women among scores that I was to meet at a mountain camp where daily they undergo, firearms, fitness and hand to hand combat training.
“I have seen frontline combat against both IS and Hashd al-Shaabi, and seen comrades die for our cause,” Atusa tells me, as around us other women in the unit practice stripping down and putting back together again their Kalashnikov assault rifles while blindfolded.
This is not simply a show for the cameras but part of a rigorous daily routine that has resulted in the women of PAK having a fearsome reputation as frontline fighters. Some PAK members are known to have travelled to Syria where they helped defend the city of Kobani against IS when the jihadists laid siege to it back in 2014.
“This is our life, we have given everything for the fight for a Kurdish homeland,” says Sarbakho who goes on to explain that many of the women have their families with them here in the camp and adjacent compound where they live together.
EACH and every member of PAK know that to return to Iran would mean certain death where the authorities in Tehran considers them terrorists.
Given this it’s perhaps hardly surprising then that PAK sees the Iranian backed Shia militia Hashd al-Shaabi, as much of a threat as IS and has on numerous occasions fought pitched battles with them along Iraqi Kurdistan’s political fault lines.
For their part Hashd al-Shaabi see PAK as little different from IS who they too have also been in the forefront of defeating. That much was made clear when I visited one of the group’s headquarters close to the village of Badoush, in the Nineveh Governate north west of the city of Mosul.
Driving up to the headquarters past the main gate a long avenue is lined with photographs of 42 Hashd al-Shaabi martyrs or “shahid”, who lost their lives fighting IS in the area.
Dotted around too there are giant posters of Iran’s most powerful military commander, General Qassem Soleimani the Commander of the Quds Force of the Iranian Revolutionary Guard Corps and Abu Mahdi al- Muhandis, the senior commander of Hashd al-Shaabi who were both assassinated in a US airstrike last year that set alarm bells ringing across the region and wider world.
Haji Abu Turab Al Hilali is deputy commander of Hashd al-Shaabi in Nineveh Governate and explained to me their role in the area.
“We came here to fight the terrorists of IS and that job is not yet over, but we Hashd al-Shaabi also work to help rebuild the local community after the war,” Al Hilali tells me as his heavily armed men gather round to hear their commander speak. A slight man serious in demeanour and dressed in the familiar all black uniform of the Shia militias, it’s only when a US Chinook and Blackhawk helicopter pass high overhead that the mood lightens.
“The Americans,” Al Hilali says, pointing skywards with a smile, “perhaps they are coming here for us.”
READ MORE: Iraq and the Balkans remind us of the power of the people
All joking aside though it is the growing presence of Iran through militias like Hashd al-Shaabi that is seriously giving Washington cause for concern. That Hashd’s presence too is resented by a growing number of Iraqis, especially Kurds who view their role as little more than a determined effort to extend Iran’s influence in their country, does not bode well for the future.
For now, such fault lines across Iraq’s political landscape remain largely dormant with only the occasional flare up between rivals like Hashd al-Shaabi and their Kurdish and other opponents in Baghdad and elsewhere.
But as the recent election acrimony revealed, tensions simmer menacingly and the threat of them boiling over is forever real. It’s a situation that suits the ever lurking and malign presence that is IS who are slowly rebuilding albeit in a more shadowy guise for now.
Almost two decades on from the US invasion, Iraq remains divided and provides the arena for new proxy battles being fought or about to be fought by myriad players. Those fault lines, worryingly, continue to grow.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel