30 MPs have urged Rachel Reeves to impose a wealth tax on Britain’s rich in next week’s budget rather than announce spending cuts that would hit the poor hardest.
Former Labour leader Jeremy Corbyn and his then shadow chancellor, John McDonnell say she could raise £24bn a year from a 2% tax on wealth above £10m and lay the foundations for a fairer and more sustainable economy.
Labour has committed not to increase taxes on “working people” by raising income tax, national insurance and VAT, and has promised to cap corporation tax on businesses at the current rate.
❌"Well, the first thing I would like [Rachel Reeves] to do is abolish [inheritance tax] completely."
— Institute of Economic Affairs (@iealondon) October 21, 2024
👨🏫IEA Economics Fellow, @julianHjessop, warns of unintended consequences if the Chancellor raises inheritance tax. pic.twitter.com/HszRxnY10R
The signatories however still argue that wealth is under-taxed in the UK and a new levy on the rich would generate a “large stream of revenue”.
The letter, organised by the campaign group Green New Deal Rising, says in contrast to the general trend, taxes on the very richest are only slightly more onerous than they were in the mid-1960s.
They told the Guardian: “This is deeply unfair and immoral: in an age of climate and economic crises, where public funds are desperately needed, it is necessary that we redress this imbalance. The transformative potential of taxes on extreme wealth is clear, and appetite for them is growing.”
Cabinet united on the Government’s spending plans
Rachel Reeves has insisted that the Cabinet is united on the Government’s spending plans amid reports of arguments over the upcoming Budget.
The Chancellor was reportedly locked in negotiations with some ministers until last week as she sought £40 billion of tax rises and spending cuts ahead of the announcement on October 30.
Speaking to the PA news agency, Ms Reeves said the final settlements had been confirmed but acknowledged it had been “right for all Cabinet members to want to get the best settlement for their departments”.
She added that settling departmental budgets was “an important achievement and shows the determination of this Government to get a grip of the public finances, and shows that we are as one, united in fixing the mess that the Conservatives left for us”.
Recommended reading:
Rachel Reeves planning £3bn welfare cuts in Budget
Cabinet is ‘united’ on Budget, says Reeves after ministers settle spending plans
UK borrowing surges past official forecasts ahead of Budget
Ms Reeves insisted her Budget would be “honest” about the state of the public finances and what needed to be done to put them “on a firm footing” while doing “everything within our power” to protect living standards and the NHS.
The health service is one of the few departments expected to emerge victorious from the Budget process. Reports suggest it will receive a significant real-terms increase in funding as the Government stakes its popularity on cutting waiting lists.
But Government sources said reports of an increase of 3-4% were inaccurate.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel