The Rwanda Bill has been a much-discussed topic in British politics over the past couple of years, and after much opposition Parliament approved plans to send some asylum seekers to the African country on Monday (April 22).
The first deportation flight to Rwanda was meant to take off in June 2022 but was cancelled just minutes before take-off following a ruling by a judge at the European Court of Human Rights in Strasbourg.
Then in 2023, the Court of Appeal ruled the policy was unlawful, with judges concluding that Rwanda was not a safe country, with the Supreme Court in the UK agreeing.
In response, ministers published the Bill and a treaty with Rwanda, both of which were intended to prevent further legal challenges.
The Safety of Rwanda Bill has passed Parliament and will become law.
— Home Office (@ukhomeoffice) April 23, 2024
This landmark Bill will prevent legal challenges being used to delay the removal of asylum seekers to Rwanda. pic.twitter.com/oHdsfcL0Ty
However, this always had opposition from the House of Lords but after that was dropped last night the bill was pushed through and it is set to become law.
Prime Minister Rishi Sunak said in a statement following the passing of the Rwanda Bill that "nothing will stand in our way" for getting flights off the ground.
Ahead of the bill passing, Mr Sunak said flights to Rwanda would take off within 10 to 12 weeks, missing his original spring target, BBC News reported.
How will the Rwanda Bill work?
As reported by The Independent The Safety of Rwanda (Asylum and Immigration) Bill compels judges to regard the African country as “safe” and disapplies sections of the Human Rights Act and international law.
It adds: "The legislation would also give ministers the power to ignore emergency injunctions.
"Asylum-seekers could still challenge deportation based on their individual circumstances, such as serious mental or physical conditions, or if they are a victim of torture or if they are suicidal."
Start the flights.
— Rishi Sunak (@RishiSunak) April 23, 2024
Stop the boats.
That's what this bill delivers. pic.twitter.com/y93Ti3qe2k
However, they would not be able to make a generic argument that removal to Rwanda presented a general risk of 'refoulement'.
Recommended reading:
- DVLA alert to millions of drivers over new tax, MOT & driving licence process
- Blue badge holders warned of £1,000 fines if they do not act
- Lloyds, Halifax & Barclays bank branches to close in weeks
This is where asylum seekers are removed and returned to a country where they face persecution.
The Conservative Party have been pushing for this bill for a long time and has argued that Rwanda will be safe for asylum seekers.
One of their points is that the Rwandan government has pledged that migrants sent there will be granted the right to live in the country with the prospect of citizenship.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel