BBC Radio 1 presenter Greg James has issued an apology following a backlash over negative representations of disability in a promotional video for a new version of Roald Dahl's book The Twits.
In the now-removed video, Greg and Chris Smith reportedly discuss how to make the characters more revolting before James tells the illustrator to give a character a glass eye to make her “more disgusting”.
After it was posted online, the chief executive of national disability charity Sense, Richard Kramer, said it was wrong for a video to be promoting a “negative representation of disability”.
Mr Kramer commented: “The video advertisement for The Twits Next Door, promoted on social media today, is totally unacceptable and has rightly been removed by Puffin Books.
Hello! Regarding our new Twits story announcement video from this morning:
— Greg James (@gregjames) April 5, 2024
We are so sorry to have caused offence with the launch video. It was absolutely not our intention. And we apologise unreservedly. It’s now gone. We understand that words matter and we pride ourselves on…
“We remain concerned however that the book, scheduled for release later in the year, will contain a character with a disability to show, in the words of the video, how ‘disgusting’ they are.
“It’s 2024 and to be promoting such a negative representation of disability is wrong. Disability is not a character flaw.
“Why would we want children to associate a glass eye, or any prosthetic, with being disgusting? What will children learn from that? How will that make disabled readers feel?”
Greg James apologises ‘unreservedly’ for ‘glass eye’ comment
In a post on social media, Greg “unreservedly” apologised and said: “Hello! Regarding our new Twits story announcement video from this morning:
“We are so sorry to have caused offence with the launch video.
When there's positive representation of disabilities in children's books, children with disabilities feel seen and heard, and their friends and classmates treat everyone the same.
— RNIB (@RNIB) April 5, 2024
There is nothing at all revolting about prosthetic eyes, we think they're brilliant (1/2) https://t.co/gx1obGkXby
“It was absolutely not our intention. And we apologise unreservedly. It’s now gone.
“We understand that words matter and we pride ourselves on championing and welcoming everyone into the magical world of children’s books.
“We would never dream of deliberately setting out to exclude anyone.
“With the glass eye comment, we were attempting to pay homage to one of the Twit’s most famous pranks involving a glass of beer in order to remind people of Dahl’s infamous terrible two.
“It’s in no way a suggestion that this forms any part of the plot of the new story nor was it our intention to suggest that it was in any way disgusting.
“It’s unfortunate that the word disgusting appears to be a direct comment on that. That’s an error on our part.
“We are devastated that it’s come across like this but completely understand why there is anger.”
Greg said it was right for the video to be called out and said they were “upset” about the mistake, but are “still incredibly proud of this book”.
Elsewhere a spokesperson for the Royal National Institute Of Blind People (RNIB) responded to say “there is nothing at all revolting about prosthetic eyes.”
Recommended reading:
- Radio 1's Big Weekend lineup for 2024 and how you can get tickets
- Why did Roman Kemp leave Capital Radio? The personal tragedy behind his decision
- New BBC Radio 2 Love Songs host revealed following Steve Wright's death
In a post to X, the RNIB said: “When there’s positive representation of disabilities in children’s books, children with disabilities feel seen and heard, and their friends and classmates treat everyone the same.
“There is nothing at all revolting about prosthetic eyes, we think they’re brilliant.”
Puffin Books and the Roald Dahl Company have been approached for comment by the PA news agency.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel