Whether its Starbucks or Costa, Hot Chocolate is my go-to on any cafe menu.
Steaming hot chocolatey goodness, coated in skooshy cream (I'm Scottish) and topped with sweet and melting marshmallows - it just can't be beaten.
But with so many major coffee shop chains offering the classic hot drink - not to mention the abundance of festive spin-offs - how can we possibly know who does the best one?
That's my cue.
I (too enthusiastically) volunteered as tribute to taste test hot chocolates for some of the UK's biggest brands from Starbucks and Costa to Pret A Manger and Caffè Nero.
@uktoday_ I found the best hot chocolate between #starbucks #costa #pretamanger #caffenero ♬ Hanging Lanterns - Kalaido
My dentist was less than pleased.
I ordered a medium (or regular depending on the store's offering) takeaway hot chocolate from each place.
Here's what I thought based on its taste as well as how much it cost and whether I thought it was worth the money based on what you got with it.
Enjoy and let us know what your favourite hot chocolate is in the comments.
Costa
Score - 8/10
Cost - £4.35
I wasn't expecting a lot from Costa's Hot Chocolate but I was pleasantly surprised.
As a child and teen, I spent a lot of time in this particular chain and I always found its hot chocolate bland and too milky.
Even its whipped cream was a bit sickly for me but I'm happy to report that I was proven wrong.
This time around, it hit just the right spot.
There was plenty of chocolatey flavour without it being too sugary.
At £4.35, it's the most expensive out of the lot but overall I would say it's worth the extra pennies.
There's not a substantial difference in price compared to its rival and the cost does include both cream and marshmallows.
Caffè Nero
Score - 6/10
Score - £3.50
Truthfully, Caffè Nero's regular Hot Chocolate was nothing special. In fact, I was a little disappointed.
I have always considered Caffè Nero's version to be among the best - it's always been the most chocolatey (to give you the technical term).
Also, I've always enjoyed the chocolate chips they used to top the whipped cream with rather than marshmallows.
It was perfectly drinkable - if a bit milky - which I guess fits its £3.50 price point.
However, this price didn't include any toppings - you need to pay another 50p for cream for example.
For this reason, I won't be in a rush to try it again.
Pret A Manger
Score - 4/10
Cost - £3.45
I'm struggling to find many good things to say about Pret's Hot Chocolate I'm afraid.
I'd never had one from Pret before so I had no idea about what to expect.
It was ready extremely quickly - too quickly - which was immediately unnerving.
Don't get me wrong, speedy service earns it brownie points but it did make me question, how much effort and attention had been taken into its preparation.
Ultimately I only drank half of my Hot Chocolate, throwing the rest into a bin on Edinburgh's Princes Street.
I hate throwing any kind of food away but it was so flavourless, I simply couldn't taste any chocolate at all.
Although it was warm, it reminded me of the hot milk that you would give to a child to knock them out before bedtime.
If that's what you're looking for? Great. If you're looking for a chocolatey Ho Cho, keep walking.
Starbucks
Score - 9/10
Cost - £3.80
I can't really fault Starbucks' Hot Chocolate.
In my opinion, it scores well across the board. It lands with a good and present chocolatey taste without being too sweet and sickly.
Recommended reading
- £5 supermarket red wine review - Where sells the best wine?
- Drink or down the sink? I tried instant coffee from Lidl, Tesco and more
- Where sells the best wine? £5 supermarket white wine review
At the same time, it's a good price at £3.80 - especially compared to what feels like the rest of Starbucks' menu at the moment.
The price also includes the cream which was an added bonus and makes it the cheapest out of the lot - especially when you consider the add ons.
Those looking for a reliable, good-tasting winter treat, don't need to look any further.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel