The 'shocking' sugar contents of the country's favourite sweets and chocolate bars have been revealed in a list of the worst brands for sugar intake.
The research, undertaken by Vera Clinic Cosmetic Dentistry, revealed the 10 worst brands in terms of sugar intake, naming the likes of Kit Kat and Starburst among the highest.
Recently, governments have attempted to curtail sugar intake through the introduction of the Sugar Tax in 2018, seeing brands like Pepsi and Barr reduce the amount of sugar in their UK products.
Reducing your family's sugar-intake doesn't have to be complicated. Simple tips here: https://t.co/6bLmCd0oPP pic.twitter.com/oAkLLcglsf
— NHS (@NHSuk) February 7, 2017
However, as data shows, a high amount of sugar is still present in some of our favourite treats.
The research revealed the average portion size of each confection, the sugar in grams, and the number of times the sugar is above the daily allowance for those aged 11 or over, 7 to 10, and 4-6.
READ MORE: Parents issued urgent warning over ‘number one reason' for child hospital admissions
READ MORE: Asda, Tesco, Aldi and more forced into nationwide ban amid crackdown
With Halloween and trick or treating fast approaching, here are the top ten worst confectionaries for sugar intake according to the experts over at Vera Clinic Cosmetic Dentistry.
The ten sweet and chocolate brands with the highest sugar intake
Some of the country's most popular sweet and chocolate brands were named to have among the highest sugar contents.
1. Starburst
- Average portion: 45 grams
- Sugar: 37 grams
Number of times above the recommended daily allowance:
- 11+ years: 1.2
- 7 to 10 years old: 1.6
- 4 to 6 years old: 2.0
2. Skittles
- Average portion: 45 grams
- Sugar: 33 grams
Number of times above the recommended daily allowance:
- 11+ years: 1.1
- 7 to 10 years old: 1.4
- 4 to 6 years old: 1.7
3. Mars Bar
- Average portion: 51 grams
- Sugar: 31 grams
Number of times above the recommended daily allowance:
- 11+ years: 1.0
- 7 to 10 years old: 1.3
- 4 to 6 years old: 1.6
4. Double Decker
- Average portion: 55 grams
- Sugar: 30 grams
Number of times above the recommended daily allowance:
- 11+ years: 1.0
- 7 to 10 years old: 1.3
- 4 to 6 years old: 1.6
5. Cadbury Creme Egg
- Average portion: 40 grams
- Sugar: 27 grams
Number of times above the recommended daily allowance:
- 11+ years: 0.9
- 7 to 10 years old: 1.1
- 4 to 6 years old: 1.4
6. Crunchie
- Average portion: 40 grams
- Sugar: 26 grams
Number of times above the recommended daily allowance:
- 11+ years: 0.9
- 7 to 10 years old: 1.1
- 4 to 6 years old: 1.4
7. Twix
- Average portion: 50 grams
- Sugar: 24 grams
Number of times above the recommended daily allowance:
- 11+ years: 0.8
- 7 to 10 years old: 1.0
- 4 to 6 years old: 1.3
8. Galaxy
- Average portion: 42 grams
- Sugar: 23 grams
Number of times above the recommended daily allowance:
- 11+ years: 0.8
- 7 to 10 years old: 1.0
- 4 to 6 years old: 1.2
9. Aero
- Average portion: 36 grams
- Sugar: 21 grams
Number of times above the recommended daily allowance:
- 11+ years: 0.7
- 7 to 10 years old: 0.9
- 4 to 6 years old: 1.1
10. Kit Kat
- Average portion: 42 grams
- Sugar: 21 grams
Number of times above the recommended daily allowance:
- 11+ years: 0.7
- 7 to 10 years old: 0.9
- 4 to 6 years old: 1.1
This research was undertaken ahead of Halloween and done so through the use of sources such as the recommended sugar intake from the NHS.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel