Rishi Sunak has backed proposals for a Commons vote on the winter fuel payment.
The former prime minister is one of several MPs to have signed an Early Day Motion (EDM), urging the Government to back down on its policy to end the universal winter fuel payment for pensioners.
Winter fuel payments of up to £300 were previously paid to all pensioners, regardless of their income or benefits.
But Chancellor Rachel Reeves claimed Labour had inherited a £22 billion “black hole” in this year’s budget when she arrived in Number 11 Downing Street, made up of allegedly unfunded spending pledges by the previous Conservative government, so declared she would limit winter fuel payments to people on income-related benefits or tax credits to ease fiscal pressures.
That policy is expected to reduce the number of pensioners in receipt of the payment by 10 million, from 11.4 million to 1.5 million, saving some £1.4 billion this financial year.
The Tories in opposition have begun efforts to block the move after Work and Pensions Minister Emma Reynolds laid the legislation designed to set it in motion on Thursday.
The new rules are due to come into force on September 16.
“This Labour government has tried to avoid scrutiny in Parliament for the consequences of their actions, but the public deserve better,” Conservative shadow treasury minister Laura Trott said.
The Government has used its powers to lay secondary legislation, which does not require a debate in the House of Commons chamber.
MPs who have signed the Conservatives’ motion, including Mr Sunak, shadow chancellor Jeremy Hunt, shadow work and pensions secretary Mel Stride, and shadow energy secretary Claire Coutinho, have bid for the new rules to “be annulled”.
Ms Trott added: “Labour’s disastrous decision to scrap Winter Fuel Payments must be held to account.”
Tabling an EDM could put pressure on the Government to allow MPs to vote on the winter fuel payment proposals, but a vote is not guaranteed and the Government does not have to find time for a debate.
Conservative Party sources unveiled their EDM as news broke that the average household bill would rise by £149 from October after the regulator Ofgem said it would increase its price cap this winter.
The regulator announced it is hiking its cap by 10% from the current £1,568 for a typical household in England, Scotland and Wales to £1,717.
It is around £117 cheaper than the cap in October last year, which was £1,834.
Ofgem said rising prices in the international energy market, due to heightened political tensions and extreme weather events, were the main driver behind the decision.
Asked about the EDM, Labour backbencher Rachael Maskell did not say whether she would sign it, but she called on the Government to rethink its legislation.
The York Central MP told the PA news agency: “In the light of the sharp increase in the energy price cap, it is vital that the winter fuel payment regulations are withdrawn and amended as older people need to be kept warm and well this winter.
“Fuel poverty has a serious cost to health and life and no frail or elderly person should have to worry about putting the heat on.
“Labour must bring forward a package of support that will protect the most vulnerable this winter.”
Meanwhile, Labour peer Lord Foulkes of Cumnock, who was also chair of the board of trustees of Age Scotland, called Reeves’s decision a “terrible blunder” and “critical error”.
He wrote in The Guardian: “I know there is widespread support, on the Labour benches, for a rethink and that Reeves can demonstrate she is the statesperson I know her to be by telling the Treasury mandarins to think again.”
On the price cap, a Labour spokesperson said earlier on Friday: “This price increase is the harvest of 14 years of Tory neglect and failure to prepare and invest in British-owned clean energy.
“While they were quick to blame everybody but themselves during the energy crisis, the Tories dragged their feet on energy security and took a hammer to the renewable energy sector, with working families still paying the price.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel