A polar bear that killed a young mother and her baby in western Alaska was likely an older animal in poor physical condition.
However, tests came back negative for pathogens that affect the brain and cause aggressive behaviour, officials said.
Dr Kimberlee Beckmen, a state wildlife veterinarian, collected and examined samples from the bear’s head the day after the attack, when weather conditions allowed her and an Alaska State Trooper to fly to the village.
The results of her analysis, indicate the bear was an adult male, probably older and in poor physical health.
Officials sent a tooth to a lab to determine the bear’s age, but those results will not be known for months.
Standard tests conducted on available tissues for pathogens were negative for rabies, toxoplasmosis, distemper and bird flu.
“There is no definitive explanation as to why the bear was in poor body condition,” the Alaska Department of Fish and Game and the US Fish and Wildlife Service said in a joint statement.
Summer Myomick and her one-year-old son, Clyde Ongtowasruk, were mauled to death on January 17, as they left the school in Wales, Alaska, for a short walk of about 150 yards to the town’s medical clinic.
School employees attempted to stop the attack by hitting the bear with shovels, but it turned on them and chased forcing them back inside for safety.
The principal slammed the door to keep the bear out of the school, which was in session.
A village resident later arrived with a gun and killed the animal.
It was the first fatal polar bear attack in Alaska in three decades.
Polar bears are the largest bear species, according to the Fish and Wildlife Service. Males typically weigh 270-540kg, but can be more than 770kg and reach up to 10 feet in length.
Polar bears generally feed on seals but also prey on walruses and beluga whales.
Wales, a whaling village of about 160 people, is located about 640 miles north-west of Anchorage and is accessible by plane or boat.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules here