THE SCOTTISH Greens have slammed the new COP29 climate financial package for falling short on the funds requested by developing nations.
Saturday saw wealthier nations commit to paying a combined $300 billion a year to assist developing countries move away from fossil fuels and invest in renewables. Wealthier nations will also strive to raise a combined $1.3 trillion a year from both public and private sources to ease the transition.
The deal has seen heavy criticism from representatives of developing countries for falling short of the $500bn per year requested. The African Group of Negotiators described the package as "too little, too late", and India dismissed the deal as a “paltry sum".
READ MORE: Keir Starmer pledges 81 per cent emissions cut at COP29
Scottish Greens co-leader Patrick Harvie labelled the deal “hopeless”.
In a statement, Harvie said: “This year’s COP has produced a hopelessly weak deal for island nations and developing nations at a time of urgent climate crisis.
“Once again it has been treated as a stage for political leaders to greenwash their polluting records. It often seems like the worse the crisis gets, the less that leaders and governments are willing to do to tackle it.
“We cannot afford any more wasted days or failed summits while climate chaos devastates lives from Vietnam to Valencia. The best time to move on from fossil fuels was decades ago, but the next best time is right now.”
The head of the UN climate body, Simon Stiell, admitted that the deal falls short: "No country got everything they wanted, and we leave Baku with a mountain of work still to do".
Harvie added: “We need to prioritise climate restoration and huge investment to mitigate the devastating impact that the crisis is already having…instead we have seen wealthier countries, including some of the biggest polluters, shirking their responsibility and continuing with business as usual while the world burns around them.”
COP29 is the United Nations' annual climate change summit. This year's conference takes place in Azerbaijan, whose economy is primarily fuelled by its petroleum and natural gas industries, which account for over 90% its exports.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel