THE International Criminal Court has issued an arrest warrant for Israeli prime minister Benjamin Netanyahu.
In a statement released on Thursday, the ICC “unanimously” rejected objections brought by Israel and said it had found sufficient evidence to arrest Netanyahu for “the war crime of starvation as a method of warfare and the crimes against humanity of murder, persecution, and other inhumane acts”.
The UK is one of 124 countries to have signed up as a party to the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court.
READ MORE: Full list of countries that must arrest Netanyahu amid ICC warrant
In 2001, the previous Labour government passed the International Criminal Court Act into domestic UK law.
This means that should Netanyahu set foot on UK soil, the Labour Government is legally obliged to arrest him.
What has Keir Starmer said about the UK's obligations?
We asked: “If the International Criminal Court issues an arrest warrant for Netanyahu, would you honour it?
“If he came to the UK, would a government that you lead see him arrested?”
He responded: “Well, look, that's a completely hypothetical because, you know the procedure in the court, which is the prosecutor asks or seeks the warrant, the court, in due course, or a chamber within the court, in due course, will make its decision.
“So, we'll wait and see."
Starmer went on: “But, look, we have supported the independence of the court. I believe in the rule of law.
“There's no equivalence, we’ll never accept equivalence between Hamas and Israel, which has its right to self-defence.
“But I believe in the international rule of law and I respect the independence of both the prosecutor and the court, but they've got a decision to make at some point in the future.”
Pressed on whether he would honour any arrest warrant the ICC may issue, Starmer only said: “I will deal with that when the court has made its decision.”
The UK Government has been approached for comment.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel