MPs at Westminster have launched an inquiry into the Scottish Government’s funding.
On Thursday, the Scottish Affairs Committee said it would be investigating the Barnett formula, which sees Scotland allocated funding according to spending decisions south of the Border.
MPs on the committee are also set to look at how in-year changes to the Scottish Budget are forced by UK Government decisions and “fiscal events”.
The inquiry will further “explore the effectiveness of the wider financing of the Scottish Government, including the fiscal framework, Block Grant Adjustments and the process for Barnett formula bypass”. The inquiry is not due to examine budgetary choices made by the Scottish Government. That is a devolved role for the Holyrood parliament.
READ MORE: Scottish independence support rises two points amid Labour Budget fallout
The Scottish Affairs Committee is supposed to focus on the work of the Scotland Office and other UK Government bodies – but the incoming Labour Government has signalled that it intends to break from convention and use it to increase pressure on SNP ministers as well.
Patricia Ferguson, the Scottish Labour MP who is chair of the Scottish Affairs Committee, said: “The committee’s inquiry is a timely opportunity to examine the current funding model for the Scottish Government, and wider model of fiscal devolution.
“Our inquiry will explore how Scotland’s funding arrangements, particularly the Barnett formula, came to be, and how it determines the level of funding made available to the Scottish Government.
“As part of this, we'll also look closely at the current Fiscal Framework.”
The committee has invited written submissions through its website by January 5. Submissions should look at issues including:
- How effective is the Barnett formula in calculating the amount of money made available to Scotland for providing essential public services?
- What was the original design intention behind the Barnett Formula, and to what extent has it fulfilled this purpose?
- What potential reforms to the Barnett formula could improve its effectiveness?
- How transparent is the UK Government’s decision making regarding the application of the Barnett Formula? What impact could putting the Barnett formula on a statutory footing, or otherwise formalising it, have on its effectiveness?
- Following its review in 2023, to what extent does the current Fiscal Framework effectively govern the mechanisms for Block Grant Adjustments and fiscal flexibilities of the Scottish Government?
- To what extent could changes to Scottish Government borrowing powers enable more effective fiscal management, and mitigate against the impact of inflation and economic shocks in Scotland? Does the current methodology for calculating Block Grant Adjustments effectively reflect the associated transfer of tax revenues or welfare spending?
- Within the existing devolution settlement, what steps could the UK Government take to offer Scotland more financial certainty?
- Is there an appropriate level of coordination between the UK and Scottish Governments regarding in-year fiscal changes?
- To what extent can HM Treasury’s decisions regarding the block grant be challenged by the Scottish Government?
- Are there any comparative perspectives that should be considered when assessing the effectiveness of fiscal devolution in Scotland? What learnings can be drawn from Wales and Northern Ireland’s funding settlement arrangements?
- Are there any learnings from international perspectives that should be considered?
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel