SNP Westminster leader Stephen Flynn has questioned the UK Government’s promises on GB Energy after reports showed a massive fall in the projected number of jobs it will create.
On Wednesday, GB Energy chair Juergen Maier told MPs on the Energy Security and Net Zero Committee that he expected between 200 and 300 jobs to be created in Aberdeen.
The estimate was less than one-third of what Maier had claimed just last month, when he told MPs discussing Labour’s Great British Energy Bill that the publicly owned firm would create more than 1000 jobs in the Scottish city.
Highlighting the discrepancy on social media, Flynn shared headlines containing the vastly different estimates side by side.
“700 fewer jobs in just 43 days,” the Aberdeen South MP wrote.
700 fewer jobs in just 43 days. pic.twitter.com/JM89zSj4oQ
— Stephen Flynn MP (@StephenFlynnSNP) November 20, 2024
Previously, the UK Government has refused to detail how many jobs it expects to create, saying only that the “exact number of roles in Great British Energy will be driven by the organisational structures and priorities”.
It comes after scrutiny of GB Energy in the media revealed that its chair Maier will not be based in Scotland. Despite numerous pledges to base the firm north of the Border, he will instead control the Labour project from a base in Manchester.
The National has also revealed that GB Energy will not have its own headquarters in Aberdeen.
READ MORE: Wee Ginger Dug: No answer from Labour on when GB Energy will reduce bills
Instead, it will be based in the same building as an existing office for staff in the UK Government’s Department for Energy Security and Net Zero (DESNZ). Oil giants including Shell and Dana Petroleum have offices in the same building.
Elsewhere on Wednesday, Maier told MPs that the first phase of investment from GB Energy would not happen until "well into" 2025, and that it would be "very modest".
The GB Energy chair said the first phase of investment would be worth just £125 million. Labour have earmarked £8.3 billion to fund GB Energy over the current Westminster parliament, which experts have previously told The National will not be enough.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel