IAN Murray has been accused of perpetrating an “affront to devolution” after he refused to lift the veto on Scottish gender reform – despite the blocked bill having the support the Scottish Labour.
The Scottish Secretary was criticised after he appeared before Westminster’s Scottish Affairs Committee on Wednesday morning, using the opportunity to rule out lifting the Tory-imposed veto on the Gender Recognition Reform (Scotland) Bill.
The bill passed in December 2022 with support from MSPs in all parties at Holyrood – and Scottish Labour leader Anas Sarwar whipped his group to vote to pass the legislation.
However, then-Scottish secretary Alister Jack used a “Section 35 order” – a power created under the 1998 Scotland Act but never before used – to prevent it from becoming law.
READ MORE: Gillian Mackay: Gender reform delivered a Holyrood supermajority by any definition
Murray, Labour’s Scottish Secretary since the July General Election, has taken Jack’s side over his own party’s.
He claimed that his Tory predecessor had used the Section 35 order to ask “the courts to determine whether or not it was lawful to use Section 35 of the Scotland Act in order to determine whether or not a question of cross-border issues arose”.
While Murray did not say he believed the Tories had been right to use the order, he insisted Labour would not revoke it.
He told MPs on the Scottish Affairs Committee: “Was it the right thing to do in terms of the previous government using it? I have said clearly we won't lift the Section 35 order that was put in place on that basis.
“And it's probably a question for the previous government in terms of whether or not they should have used it, but it's a political question for them, not a legal question for us.”
Greens, who accused the Labour MP of an “affront to devolution”.
Murray’s comments were attacked by the ScottishMaggie Chapman, the Greens’ equalities spokesperson, said: “Ian Murray’s refusal to undo the Tory veto on gender reform is utterly shameful, and serves as a reminder of the contempt Westminster governments have for devolution and equality.
“A clear majority of MSPs across Holyrood supported this bill. It had a huge level of crossparty support and was backed by almost every reputable equalities organisation. It was one of the most scrutinised bills in the history of our parliament.
“Self-identification is normal and is used in countries around the world. It is a small change in a clearly devolved area, and one that would give people the respect they deserve to live authentically as the people they are. The Tories chose to undermine our decision and now Labour is doing the same.
READ MORE: SNP to remain largest party at Holyrood as Scottish Labour fall further behind
“It is an affront to devolution and it is actively harming the lives of trans people who have already waited far too long for the recognition that our Parliament voted for.
“Trans people make up a small percentage of our population, yet they are continuously targeted by a cynical culture war from reactionary right wing politicians. It has real world consequences, fuelling prejudice and the rolling back of rights and access to healthcare.”
The bill would have “demedicalised” a trans person’s identification process, allowing them to self-declare their gender. Support for this was an explicit part of Scottish Labour’s 2021 manifesto, but it was stripped out of their 2024 General Election manifesto.
Scottish Labour have been approached for comment.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel