EX-RANGERS star Scott Arfield is appealing a council decision to turn down plans for a pub near Ibrox.
Arfield, who played over 200 games for the club, wants to convert an empty former bookmakers on Copland Road into a bar.
Council planners rejected his scheme due to the potential impact on residents nearby, including in the flats above, and bin storage issues.
READ MORE: Scottish shop wins favourite local business award
Now, an appeal has been launched on behalf of the footballer, who currently plays in England for Bolton Wanderers. Councillors on the city’s planning review committee are set to consider the case next week.
The architects acting for Arfield argue the proposal will bring a property which has been empty for over two years and needs “major upgrade and repair” back into use.
They add it would act as a “mini fan zone” on match days at Ibrox, taking up to 90 fans “off the street into a well-managed area, reducing pedestrian street traffic and noise”.
Opening hours could be limited to Rangers match days and special ticketed events, the appeal claims.
It adds the bar would create jobs in the area and waste can be handled within the property, with a private firm carrying out regular uplifts.
Two neighbours with concerns about the impact on residents objected to the initial application. One said over 50,000 attend Ibrox Stadium which “already causes a lot of disruption and anti-social behaviour due to alcohol consumption”.
They added anti-social behaviour ranges from “fans drinking and urinating in the street” to “being exposed to verbal abuse and deliberate damage to our property”.
The objectors believe another pub will present a “real risk” to increased anti-social behaviour, putting more pressure on “already stretched” police officers.
A council report states the applicants have asked for a site inspection and hearing to be held. Councillors will be able to decide whether these are required.
This is the second application to turn the former Ladbrokes into a pub after Arfield’s first proposal was refused in August last year.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel