AN SNP Cabinet Secretary has issued a stern warning about negative briefing to the press, urging figures within the party to “leave yer ego to the side”.
Shirley-Anne Somerville spoke out amid an internal row over SNP MP Stephen Flynn’s intention to stand for Holyrood while retaining his Westminster seat.
Flynn’s announcement earlier in the week sparked criticism from within his own party, and MSP Emma Roddick was among those who called for him to rethink.
The former minister said: “Party members set this rule for good reasons. Rightly, Douglas Ross was criticised for holding two roles simultaneously. I hope Stephen Flynn rethinks.
“Can't imagine spending half my time in London and being a good MSP. Key that rules apply to everyone equally; men and women.”
The statement has been read as an acrostic, with the first letters of each sentence spelling the word “pri*k”.
The anonymous SNP insider further launched a ferocious attack on Roddick, saying: “If she believes what she’s saying can she now tell people which of her roles was her second choice?
“Or it could be this is just rank hypocrisy from a rubbish MSP who has achieved nothing and has everything to lose from a more talented class of SNP politicians coming through to shake up Holyrood and inject a bit of imagination and life where lazy MSPs like her have so badly failed.”
After the SNP infighting spilled out into public, Somerville (below) issued a warning against such negative briefings to the media.
The Social Justice Secretary wrote: “Wee message to everyone who is briefing against folk today either on social media or to journos who are not friends to our party or our cause – stick your papers in if you want to and then get yer walking boots on and help out at a by-election.”
She added: “Voters are angry at Labour’s betrayal on the doors so take our positive message on @theSNP delivery to voters and leave yer ego to the side for the benefit of a cause much bigger than any of us.”
The post was labelled "sanctimonious" by former SNP MP Joanna Cherry.
Cherry said: "What’s so annoying about this sanctimonious tweet is that the party machine, staffers and HQ have being briefing relentlessly against those who dared to question inaction on independence, and poor policy choices and delivery for years."
READ MORE: John Curtice on whether MPs 'double-jobbing' could affect SNP in 2026 Holyrood vote
On Sunday, Flynn spoke to the BBC’s Sunday Show about “anger” within the SNP sparked by his decision.
“Look, there's always going to be a strong reaction to someone seeking to do things slightly differently. I've experienced this before in politics,” he said.
“It's not something which is particularly pleasant. It's not something which is particularly comfortable, particularly when you're dealing with people who you know really well you're dealing with, in my case, a colleague who overlaps almost entirely with the constituency that I currently represent at Westminster.”
Flynn further claimed he would not resign his Westminster seat in order to save the taxpayer the cost of funding a by-election, and dismissed reports that he had pressed Audrey Nicoll to stand aside to allow him to run in Aberdeen South and North Kincardine.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel